The procedure for self-examination of an educational organization is a sample. Self-examination of the educational organization. Self-examination report form

[name of company]

This Regulation was developed in accordance with the order of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia dated June 14, 2013 N 462 "On approval of the Procedure for conducting self-examination educational organization", The Charter of [name of the organization] and establishes the rules for the preparation and organization of self-examination [name of the organization] (hereinafter - the organization).

1. General Provisions

1.1. The goals of self-examination are to ensure the availability and openness of information about the state educational activities organizations, as well as preparing a report on the results of self-examination (hereinafter referred to as the report).

1.2. Self-examination is carried out by the organization annually.

1.3. The self-examination procedure includes the following steps:

Planning and preparation of self-examination work;

Organization and conduct of self-examination;

Generalization of the results obtained and, on their basis, the formation of a report;

Consideration of the report [name of the organisation's governing body].

1.4. The timing, form of self-examination, the composition of the persons involved in its conduct are determined by the organization independently in the manner prescribed by this Regulation.

2. Planning and preparation of self-examination work

2.1. Self-examination is carried out by decision of [name of the organisation's governing body].

2.2. [Name of the position of the head of the organization] issues an order on the procedure, timing of self-examination and the composition of persons for self-examination (hereinafter referred to as the working group).

2.3. The chairman of the working group is [name of the position of the head of the organization].

2.4. The working group includes: [fill in the required one].

2.5. In preparation for the self-examination, the chair of the working group holds an organizational preparatory meeting with the members of the working group, at which:

The self-examination plan is reviewed and approved;

For each member of the working group, the directions of the organization's work are assigned, which are subject to study in the process of self-examination;

Clarifies the questions to be studied and evaluated in the course of self-examination;

The terms of the preliminary and final consideration of the results of self-examination are determined;

Responsible persons are appointed for the coordination of self-examination work and for the collection and registration of self-examination results.

2.6. The self-examination plan includes:

Assessment of educational and educational activities, the management structure of the organization, the content and quality of training of pupils, the organization of the educational and educational process, the quality of personnel, educational and methodological, information support, material and technical base, functioning of the internal system for assessing the quality of education, medical support, catering;

Analysis of the performance indicators of the organization.

3. Organization and conduct of self-examination

3.1. The organization of self-examination is carried out in accordance with the plan for its conduct, which is adopted by the decision of the working group.

3.2. When assessing educational activities:

A detailed description and assessment of the directions and questions included in the plan of self-examination are given;

Is given general characteristics organizations;

Information is provided on the availability of documents of title [license for the right to conduct educational activities, certificate of making an entry in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, charter, etc.];

Information is provided on the organization's documentation [contracts with parents, personal files of students, work programs, curriculum, etc.];

Information is provided on the organization's documentation regarding labor relations[personnel records, employment contracts with employees, collective agreement, internal labor regulations, etc.].

3.3. When assessing the organization's management system:

The characteristic of the existing management system in the organization is given;

An assessment of the effectiveness and efficiency of the management system operating in the organization is given;

The assessment of ensuring the coordination of the activities of pedagogical, medical and psychological work In the organisation;

An estimate is given social work organizations (work of a teacher-psychologist);

An assessment of the interaction between the family and the organization is given;

An assessment of the organization of work on the provision of benefits is given [availability regulatory framework, compliance with legal regulations, etc.].

3.4. When assessing the content and quality of training of students:

The state of educational work is analyzed and evaluated;

The condition is analyzed and evaluated additional education;

The analysis of the work on studying the opinions of participants in educational relations about the activities of the organization is carried out;

An analysis is carried out and an assessment is made of the quality of training of students.

3.5. When assessing the organization of the educational process, the following are analyzed and evaluated:

The curriculum of the organization, its structure, characteristics, implementation;

Analysis of the workload of students;

Analysis of the forms of work with students with special educational needs;

Information about the occupancy of groups;

Organization of training for special (remedial) training programs;

- [other indicators].

3.6. When assessing the quality of staffing, the following is analyzed and evaluated:

Professional level of personnel;

The number of teaching staff enrolled in universities with an academic degree, academic title, staffing of the organization;

The system of work to improve the qualifications and retraining of teaching staff and its effectiveness;

- [other indicators].

3.7. When assessing the quality of educational and methodological support, the following is analyzed and evaluated:

System of methodological work of the organization;

Use and improvement of educational technologies, including distance learning;

- [other indicators].

3.8. When assessing the quality of library information provision, the following is analyzed and evaluated:

Provision of educational, educational-methodical and fiction literature;

The total number of storage units of the library fund;

- [other indicators].

3.9. When assessing the quality of the material and technical base, the following is analyzed and evaluated:

Condition and use of the material and technical base [information on the availability of buildings and premises for the organization of educational activities, etc.];

Compliance with fire and anti-terrorist security measures in the organization [availability of automatic fire alarm, fire extinguishing equipment, panic button, security cameras, service contracts with relevant organizations, etc.];

The state of the territory of the organization [the state of the fence and lighting of the site, the presence and condition of the necessary signs road traffic and etc.]

3.10. When assessing the quality of medical support of an educational organization, the health care system of pupils, the following is analyzed and evaluated:

Medical care, conditions for wellness work;

The presence of a medical office, its compliance with the current sanitary rules;

Regularity of medical examinations by employees of the organization;

Analysis of the incidence of inmates;

Information about cases of traumatism among pupils;

Balancing the schedule in terms of compliance with sanitary standards

- [other indicators].

3.11. When assessing the quality of catering, the following is analyzed and evaluated:

The work of the administration to control the quality of food preparation;

Contracts with suppliers of products;

Food quality;

Availability of the necessary documentation;

- [other indicators].

3.12. When assessing the functioning of the internal system for assessing the quality of education, the following is analyzed and evaluated:

Availability of documents regulating the functioning of the internal system for assessing the quality of education;

The presence of a person responsible for organizing the functioning of the internal system for assessing the quality of education;

The work plan of the organization to ensure the functioning of the internal system for assessing the quality of education and its implementation;

Awareness of the participants in educational relations about the functioning of the internal system for assessing the quality of education;

- [other indicators].

4. Generalization of the results obtained and the formation of a report

4.1. The information obtained as a result of collecting information in accordance with the approved self-examination plan, members of the working group are transferred to the person responsible for the collection and registration of the results of self-examination of the organization, no later than [period] before the preliminary consideration of the working group of self-examination results.

4.2. The person responsible for the summary and registration of the results of the organization's self-examination, summarizes the data obtained and draws up them in the form of a report.

4.3. The report includes the analytical part and the results of the analysis of the performance indicators of the organization.

4.4. On preliminary review of the report working group certain issues are clarified, opinions are expressed on the need to collect additional information, conclusions and proposals based on the results of self-examination are discussed.

4.5. After a final review of the results of the self-examination, the final report form is sent to [name of governing body] for review.

4.6. The report is approved by the order of the [named positions of the head] and certified by the seal of the organization.

4.7. The report is posted on the Internet on the official website and sent to the founder [educational organizations higher education, professional educational organizations, organizations of additional professional education, organizations of additional education - no later than April 20, and general educational organizations and preschool educational organizations - no later than September 1] of the current year.

Rosobrnadzor information letters about the postponement of the early period were sent to the education authorities of all municipal districts. Order,...

The department of information and analytical work (347-80-51) deals with filling out reports on the results of self-examination.

Previous graduates who apply for participation in the early period will be registered to take exams on the reserve days of the main period. NS...

Good afternoon! Information about the re-registration procedure for the main period in the Regional information system will be published additionally ...

You can consult by calling 347-53-07 (Tatiana Viktorovna).

There are no official documents on your question yet.

Can. But now the issue of postponing the early USE period is being resolved, follow the news.

We are waiting for the official confirmation of the transfer, it is not yet available. After that, we will publish the news on our website with a list of necessary actions.

Hello! No official documents about this yet.

Hello! It is necessary to write an application to the State Examination Commission (SEC) about the transfer of exams to the reserve days of the main l ...

Hello! It will be necessary to write an application to the State Examination Commission (SEC) about the transfer of exams to the reserve days of the main ...

Hello! The final essay on the Russian language is written in grade 11, as an admission to the state final certification, its results are indefinite ...

Information can be clarified in the department for assessing the quality of education (tel. 347-45-72).

Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of June 14, 2013 N 462
"On approval of the Procedure for conducting self-examination by an educational organization"

With changes and additions from:

7. The results of the organization's self-examination are drawn up in the form of a report, including the analytical part and the results of the analysis of the performance indicators of the organization subject to self-examination.

The reporting period is the one preceding the self-examination. calendar year.

The report is signed by the head of the organization and certified by its seal.

8. Placement of reports of organizations in information and telecommunication networks, including on the official website of the organization in the Internet, and sending it to the founder, shall be carried out no later than April 20 of the current year.

_____________________________

* Clause 3 of part 2 of article 29 Federal law of December 29, 2012 N 273-FZ "On education in Russian Federation"(Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation, 2012, No. 53, Art. 7598; 2013, No. 19, Art. 2326).

One of the main goals of self-examination is to ensure the availability and openness of information about the activities of the organization. The reporting period is the previous calendar year. The result must be posted on the website of the educational institution and transferred to the founder.

The results of self-examination are drawn up in the form of a report, including the analytical part and the results of the analysis of performance indicators. The analytical part assumes:

Analysis of the data obtained.

Revealing cause-and-effect relationships.

Determination of emerging trends.

Formulation of problems.

Suggestion of possible solutions.

A detailed report is not a mere formality. It is interesting for parents, partners of the organization and the employees themselves.

The timing, form of self-examination and the composition of participants are determined by the educational organization independently. This means the ability to choose the most suitable forms for an adequate assessment of activities, as well as to involve any specialists for the examination (including parents and experts working on a contractual basis).

If the required information is not provided in fixed time(before April 20) or does not correspond to reality, the head faces an administrative fine in the amount of 1,000 to 3,000 rubles (Art. 5.39. Administrative Code)

This book focuses on the revolutionary Scrum, a productivity-enhancing technique that delivers great results with less effort. short time and at low cost. Thanks to Scrum, giants like Google, Amazon and Salesforce. com were able to increase productivity by 300-400%.

What is evaluated

Educational organization management systems. IN regulatory documents there are no clear guidelines on how to audit management systems and how to provide information on the results of the assessment. Since all management decisions are usually regulated by local regulations (LNA), then, as a rule, this indicator is assessed on the basis of them.

Organization of the educational process.

Demand for graduates. It is quite easy to assess the demand for graduates of professional educational institutions, but graduates of general educational institutions is much more difficult. Real indicators can only be provided by a few educational institutions whose graduates receive preferences for admission to vocational education institutions. In other cases, the question remains open. Some schools cite the percentage of graduates entering universities and colleges as indicators - in this case, the emphasis should be on getting budget places.

The quality of personnel, educational, methodological, library and information support. You can evaluate it according to different parameters. For example, the report should present the results of employee participation in various professional competitions, qualification categories teachers, etc.

Material and technical base.

Functioning of the in-school system for assessing the quality of education and analysis of performance indicators established by the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia. It should be noted that it is precisely the analysis that is required, and not just the presentation of the indicators. In addition, it should be noted that for different types organizations provide different indicators.

Read also:

According to experts, the analysis of the state of many areas of activity can be carried out only on the basis of LNA. To ensure openness of information, local acts are also published on the school's website.

Also watch the webinar series:

"Local regulations: from theory to practice " Part 1 Part 2 Part 3

Self-examination can be a very effective tool in making management decisions and the development of a development program to help improve the level of compliance of the school (or other organization) with modern educational standards. Therefore, it is better to approach the analysis not formally, but responsibly, setting additional goals.

The fact that there is no "ideal leader" because one person is simply not able to perform equally well all four roles necessary for effective management of an organization: to be both a producer of results, an administrator, an entrepreneur, and an integrator. The place of the non-existent "ideal leader" should be taken by a mutually complementary team of managers, each member of which is able to perform one of the roles to perfection, and owns the rest at an acceptable level.

Self-examination as the competence of an educational organization

The competence of self-examination is approved within the framework of the internal system for assessing the quality of education (EQAS). gives the following formulation of this competence: "conducting self-examination, ensuring the functioning of the internal system for assessing the quality of education."

We can say that a self-examination report is a document by means of which an educational organization demonstrates that it has been created and is functioning. internal system assessing the quality of education. The complex of VSOKO procedures in terms of the content, conditions and results of the implementation of basic educational programs (MEP) is a condition and necessary tool self-examination. Ongoing assessment procedures provide final indicators that are recorded in the self-survey report.

The regulation of the self-examination procedure at the federal level and the requirements for the content of the self-examination report mean that the ESSO procedures and the criteria and indicators used in it should be oriented towards an external assessment of the quality of education.

An internal assessment is needed, first of all, in order to "prepare" for an external assessment, timely detect problems in the quality of educational services provided, establish the causes of these problems and take the necessary measures to eliminate them.

Since the quality of education is assessed, which is defined by law as compliance with federal standards and consumer demands, self-examination covers all three main characteristics of educational activities: conditions, content, and results.

Self-examination is carried out by the organization annually ().

The self-examination procedure includes the following steps:

• planning and preparation of works on self-examination of an educational organization;
• organizing and conducting self-examination in an educational organization;
• generalization of the results obtained and, on their basis, the formation of a report;
• consideration of the report by the governing body of the educational organization, which is responsible for resolving this issue.

The timing, form of self-examination, the composition of the persons involved in its conduct are determined by the organization independently and are fixed by a local act - the Regulation on the procedure for conducting self-examination.

Self-examination is designed to establish the level of compliance of educational activities of an educational organization with the requirements of the current federal state educational standards (FSES) of general education.

Based on the results of self-examination:

• identify positive and (or) negative tendencies in the objects of assessment (self-assessment), in the educational system of the educational organization as a whole, the reserves of its development;
• determine the reasons for the occurrence of deviations in the state of the object of study and assessment from the parameters of the ESSO, formed taking into account the requirements of the current legislation of the Russian Federation in the field of education;
• determine measures to correct the identified negative trends in educational activities of an educational organization;
• make adjustments to the ESCO.