Local self-government bodies, public associations. Interaction of local self-government bodies with public and other associations of citizens, citizens and business entities. V. Powers of public associations under

Local self-government, being the lowest level of public authority, is a very special political institution and a special sphere of government, different from public administration. The main difference lies in the influential role of the population and different forms public participation in the implementation local government... The balance of power and social principles appears to be the most important institutional property of local self-government. Local self-government is defined as the level of organization of power in the state, at which managerial and self-government mechanisms are organically intertwined to resolve issues of local importance. Ideas about the significant role of the population itself in the functioning local community based on properties of local issues. Their solution should be based solely on the interests of the residents. Local issues are the problems of those people who live in a given area. It is the residents who have the most complete information about the problems, as well as the options for their solution. The population, citizens and society are considered as the only subjects of local self-government, which have the right to exercise control over the activities of local self-government bodies, to receive the necessary reliable information about it. Many foreign models local self-government is built on a developed infrastructure of public participation, as well as intensive interaction of the population with local authorities.

One of the main goals of the modern municipal reform directly concerned the population as an active subject of local life. As noted by the President of Russia D. A. Medvedev, the priority of such a state task as the development of local self-government is due to the fact that "local self-government should open up to citizens the opportunity to independently solve their local problems without instructions and orders from above." The main goal of the reform was declared as the creation of a truly self-governing system of public power at the lower level. And, of course, one of the most important tools for the implementation of this goal was to stimulate and support associations of residents to independently resolve the issues of their territories.

For the development of social-power interaction, the following conditions are necessary:

The need to empower citizens to make decisions that most seriously affect their daily lives;

Creation of conditions for participation in decision-making;

Supporting public initiatives;

Development of relations between local governments and public organizations;

Creation of infrastructure of public associations of citizens for joint activities;

Replacing powerful methods of action with methods of interaction and cooperation.

The President's Address to the Federal Assembly in 2010 sounded the importance of modern forms of citizen participation in the development of their city and village, their greater influence on the activities of municipal bodies. One of the dominant topics is the building of everyday transparent, clear, simple relations between the state and the citizen at all levels of government. The question is imperatively raised that the regional, and even more so the municipal authorities should be in dialogue with the people. At the same time, the main criterion for assessing the work of the regional leadership is the level of trust of residents.

Within the framework of local self-government, the role of public associations is significant. They are an important channel for experimentation in the search and development of new forms of self-government activity of the population and an essential source of information about the problems and needs of residents. Public associations are not just one of the forms of expressing the needs and interests of citizens, but also a means that reveals the degree of significance and importance of such requests. In other words, they allow not only to record any phenomenon, but also to determine its qualitative aspect, intensity. The activity of public associations makes it possible to determine the level of volitional reinforcement of declared needs, interests, value orientations, which makes it possible for state and local authorities to judge the degree of claims of residents, therefore, to more objectively see the picture of existing social aspirations, it is more correct to correlate the latter with each other when making managerial decisions.

At the same time, public associations can be used by local governments as a means of bringing important information to the public. By informing public figures, the authorities thereby intensify, deepen and expand information contacts with the population as a whole. In addition, public associations are not only a means of informing citizens, identifying problems, but also important remedy solving these problems, self-realization by citizens of their own requests. For local governments, public associations are an additional means of meeting people's needs. Unfortunately, since the end of the 80s. the independent local movement, involved in the sphere of meeting public needs, began to decline. The authorities have ceased in many places to rely on the organized initiative of people. And only recently there has been a movement to restore the previous forms of work with the population. Of course, social activists should not replace employees of the local government apparatus, municipal and other enterprises and organizations. Amateur organizations of the population should work not instead of local self-government bodies and their services, but together with them.

Public associations can do a lot to activate the individual, socialize her interests. This is one of the channels of control by the population over the activities of state and local bodies, political structures. Finally, it is necessary to note the quality of representation inherent in all associations. They represent the interests of their members (participants) and those groups of the population whose views they are trying to formulate and express. And in this capacity they can take a feasible part in representative governance, including in the processes of local lawmaking and local elections.

Let's summarize some of the results. It is the topic of population participation that becomes a kind of " business card»Municipal reform. In addition to the objective need to develop public mechanisms at the municipal level, the following political factors influence the situation:

The impossibility of municipalities, due to a number of factors, to perform their duties at the local level in a quality manner, leads to the involvement of the residents themselves and their associations in resolving issues of local importance;

The situation is influenced by the factor of resistance of the bureaucratic apparatus itself to the institutionalization of public participation;

In the new socio-political conditions, the authorities are looking for new mechanisms of "feedback" with the population.

It is important to note that the development of civil society structures, support for civil initiatives "from below" is one of the trending topics of federal public policy at the level of top officials of the state. It can be assumed that the public demand for public participation will increase. And first of all, this may relate to responsibility and involvement in the management of municipal life. Therefore, the problem of insufficiently well-established interaction between the state and society is one of the most systemic, complex and important problems for Russia.

Local governments are obliged to act and make decisions based on public interests, guided by the need to meet public needs, i.e. public interest of an indefinite circle of persons or a specific citizen or organization. Therefore, the relationship of local self-government bodies and their officials with citizens and their associations should be built on the basis of the principle of ensuring the legal rights and interests of the latter.

This principle can be implemented in various forms, however, all actions and decisions of local self-government bodies and their officials should be aimed at ensuring the protection of the rights and interests of a citizen or an association of citizens.

The initiator of entering into the considered relationship can be both local government bodies and their officials, and citizens or associations of citizens.

Citizens can apply to local government bodies or local government officials with requests, suggestions, complaints or other appeals.

The appeals may relate to issues of consumer protection, clarifications of certain norms of the current legislation, consulting and other issues. Moreover, citizens can apply to local governments individually, i.e. on its own behalf, and collectively, i.e. from a group of citizens. Accordingly, the person to whom the citizen applies is obliged to try to solve the existing problem of the citizen, prepare him a detailed written response explaining the procedure for action if the solution to the issue is outside the competence of the local government, or provide other assistance that can satisfy the needs of the citizen guaranteed by the law.

Local self-government bodies can turn to citizens living in the territory of the municipality for help in organizing and holding any event, with proposals, with a request for joint decision-making.

Appeals of local self-government bodies to citizens may also be of a different nature, due to the public need to resolve this or that issue of public importance.

Citizens' associations can apply to local governments to provide them with support or assistance in solving organizational problems, individual problems or issues.

The relationship of local self-government bodies with citizens' associations can be based on partnership principles. In such cases, local self-government bodies and citizens' associations can unite their efforts to solve a particular social problem, i.e. problems affecting all or part of the population of the municipality.

For example, the relationship of local government bodies with associations of citizens in the housing sector can be a tool for ensuring conditions for effective operation both the local self-government bodies themselves and the development of citizens' initiatives to improve the situation in the communal sphere.

Local self-government bodies can participate in the implementation of collective contracts and agreements in order to facilitate the contractual regulation of social and labor relations and the harmonization of the socio-economic interests of workers and employers. At the same time, they are obliged to negotiate social and labor issues proposed for consideration by representatives of workers.

One of the legal instruments for ensuring interaction established by the Federal Law is the Public Chamber, one of the tasks of which is to ensure the interaction of citizens, public, religious, political and other associations of citizens with local governments.

Local self-government bodies have the right to interact with any business entities regardless of their form of ownership.

The subject in relation to which their relationship can be built can be various issues concerning both the interests of the entrepreneur himself (allocation of a land plot for the construction of an object of entrepreneurial activity, consulting, etc.), and the interests of the municipality (a proposal to promote a healthy lifestyle among the population, a proposal to organize and hold a holiday, review, competition and other social and cultural events at the expense of the entrepreneur, etc.).

The relationship of local governments with business entities, including individual entrepreneurs, can be based on public law or civil law principles.

Thus, an agreement between a business entity and a local government body on cooperation in the social sphere will be a public law act. A contract for the supply of goods or equipment for municipal needs will be a civil act.

A feature of the relationship of local governments with business entities is that such relationships should be aimed only at ensuring, protecting or meeting the public needs of the population or a particular citizen living in the territory of the municipality.

For example, local governments of municipal districts and urban districts are obliged by law to assist communications organizations providing universal communications services in obtaining and (or) building communications facilities and premises intended for the provision of universal communications services.

Credit consumer cooperatives citizens can interact with local governments in the implementation of the requirements of the Federal Law "On Credit Consumer Cooperatives of Citizens".

Mari legal bulletin

R. V. Gornev

SOME PROBLEMIC ASPECTS OF INTERACTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT BODIES AND PUBLIC ASSOCIATIONS

The article is devoted to the problems of interaction between local government and public associations. Public associations are one of the institutions of civil society and the interaction of local self-government bodies with them should be aimed at solving problems arising in the municipality. We believe that it is necessary to legislate the forms and methods of legal interaction between local self-government bodies and public associations.

Key words: local government, public associations, non-profit organizations, interaction, forms.

The problem of civil society, the interaction of its elements with public authorities is one of the fundamental scientific problems of our time. It appeared with the emergence of the state and the division of society into state and non-state spheres of human life1. At the same time, if in the field of interaction of state authorities with institutions of civil society and public associations, in particular, some problems have now been resolved1 2, then the field of interaction of local government with public associations is still poorly studied. In addition, it should be noted the imperfection of the actual legislative regulation of the interaction of local governments with public organizations.

In addition to the above, it is worth noting the absence in legal science of comprehensive studies of direct interaction of public associations with local governments. All of the above determines the relevance of the topic chosen for research.

The legal definition of local self-government is contained in various regulatory legal acts and documents. In the legal literature, it is noted that the Constitution of the Russian Federation does not directly offer an exhaustive legal interpretation of local self-government, as a result of which the illusion of the admissibility of an excessively broad interpretation of this phenomenon in Russian conditions is created3. The variety of constitutional characteristics

1 Lysenko V.V. Civil society and public associations in the Russian Federation // Actual problems of constitutional and municipal law. - 2001. - No. 1. - P. 25.

2 Sheryazova A. S. Relationship between state bodies and public associations: constitutional and legal aspect: author. dis. ... Cand. jurid. sciences. - Krasnodar, 2011.

3 Knyazev S.D.Local government in Russian Federation: constitutional nature and significance for municipal law // Journal of Russian law. - 2008. - No. 6.

At first glance, local self-government statistics, coupled with their well-known inconsistency and disorder, makes it possible to speak with equal success both of the absolute independence (isolation) of municipal institutions from the state administration system, and of the most severe dependence on it. In this regard, we believe that of particular importance for understanding the essence of local self-government are the provisions of the European Charter of Local Self-Government1 2. In accordance with Article 3 of this international legal act, local self-government is understood as the right and ability of local self-government bodies to regulate a significant part of public affairs and manage it, acting within the framework of the law, in accordance with with its competence and in the interests of the local population.

Neither Russian legislation nor this international legal act leaves any doubt about the essence of local self-government. This is an independent level of public power in the state, one of the forms of democracy. At the same time, sometimes in the legal literature one can find statements about local self-government as an integral part of civil society, motivation is given about the interest of citizens in solving local problems in the local territory, independent initiatives of the population. Such independence is associated with the fundamental principle of civil society - its independent position in relation to the state. However, the statement that local self-government cannot be identified with one of the elements of civil society seems to be correct3. It seems that local self-government is a kind of bridge between civil society and the state.

In the legal literature, public associations are defined as "the most important institutions of civil society, independent and self-governing associations of its members, voluntarily created for the implementation of various personal interests of the subjects of these organizations and through their general dependence and interconnection to address the interests of public" 4.

In the works of domestic researchers V.S.Nersesyants and E.A.Lukasheva it is noted that public associations are “ legal form relationships between the individual and society "5," the form of limitation of claims

1 Volkov V.E.Local government: constitutional foundations legal regulation competence municipalities: author. dis. ... Cand. jurid. sciences. - Chelyabinsk, 2007 .-- P. 3.

2 European Charter of Local Self-Government ETS No. 122 // SZ RF. - 1998. - No. 36. -St. 4466.

3 Uvarov A.A. Local government and civil society // Constitutional and municipal law. - 2008. - No. 15.

4 Soldatov S. A. Public organizations in the Russian Federation (political, legal and institutional research). - M, 1994 .-- S. 34.

5 Nersesyants V.S. History of the ideas of legal statehood. - M, 1993 .-- S. 15.

Mari legal bulletin

power ..., a counterbalance to the omnipotence of state power, designed to provide

to try its limitation and self-restraint ”.

A public association is an independent, self-governing element of civil society, independent of public authorities, whose main goal is to realize the goals and interests of its members.

At the same time, IV Mersiyanova expresses a point of view about public associations as elements of local self-government. In support, the author notes that this point of view, in contrast to the legal interpretation, more fully reflects the social essence of local government as a system of subjects, objects, relations and relationships between them, functioning to meet the needs of the population1 2. Without going into the sociological essence of the issues under study , we note that public associations, being an important institution of civil society, are not an element of local self-government, since they are not part of the system of public authority and are independent from it.

It is noted that non-profit organizations (respectively, and public associations, including) are an active part of the population that has taken up the solution of social problems and formed formal or informal groups for this. Therefore, they are one of the institutions of civil society, and the interaction of local self-government bodies with them should be aimed at solving problems arising in the municipality3.

Recommendation 139 (2003) of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe “On Non-Governmental Organizations and Local and Regional Democracy” stipulates that local non-governmental organizations fulfill their tasks in the life and work of citizens. Organized on a voluntary basis, they play, within the framework of their statutory tasks and in accordance with the rules of their activities, an important role in building a true civil society, bringing citizens closer to local governments, and in strengthening a true pluralistic democracy. A partnership based on a shared commitment from both local authorities and non-profit organizations strengthens local democracy and broadens citizen participation by reducing the distance between local authorities and citizens, ensuring that all opinions and positions are taken into account.

1 The priority of human rights as a defining principle of the rule of law. General theory of human rights / otv. ed. E. A. Lukasheva. - M, 1996 .-- S. 25.

2 Mersiyanova IV Public associations as an element of local self-government: problems of institutionalization: author. dis. ... Cand. sociol. sciences. - Stavropol, 2010.

3 Social policy in municipalities: textbook / under total. ed. N. A. Volgina, V. K. Egorova, S. V. Kalashnikova. - M., 2006 .-- S. 418.

2. Issues of public law in Russia and foreign countries

This partnership is based on the need to bring the decision-making process closer to the citizens' level and expand the mechanisms of consultation, informing and participation of citizens in assessing new forms of governance at the territorial level, as well as in the direction of the process of constant coordination of actions between NGOs and local authorities. Such a partnership is characterized by the complementarity of those services that can be provided to citizens at the local level, on the one hand, by local authorities, and on the other by NGOs, in many areas, such as social sphere, education, culture, environment, urban planning and governance. natural resources in the context of sustainable development of territories 1.

In the context of reforming the domestic legal policy in the area under consideration, it seems expedient to legislatively improve the forms and methods of interaction between local governments and public associations. In particular, in our opinion, the following forms of interaction should be enshrined in the Federal Law "On Public Associations" 1 2:

1) involvement of representatives of public associations in the work of temporary working bodies for the development of draft municipal legal acts;

2) participation in the electoral process at the local level;

3) the conclusion of contracts and agreements on interaction between local government bodies and public associations;

4) participation of public associations in the development of decisions made by local self-government bodies within the framework of permanent advisory councils, expert councils, public chambers, round tables.

In addition, it is necessary to improve the existing and create new expert and advisory councils, public chambers, which will be a kind of "platform" for legal interaction of local governments and public associations. We believe that these measures will have a positive effect on the mechanism of interaction between local government and public associations.

1 Recommendation 139 (2003) of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe “On NGOs and Local and Regional Democracy” // On the participation of citizens in public life at the local level. Obninsk: Institute of Municipal Administration (series "Documents of the Council of Europe"), 2005. - pp. 26-27.

2 the federal law from May 19, 1995 № 82-FZ "On public associations" // SZ RF. - 1995. - No. 21. - Art. 1930.

Mari legal bulletin

SOME PROBLEMS OF THE CONNECTION OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC ASSOCIATIONS

This article covers the problems of the connection of the local government and public associations is actual and insufficiently explored question nowadays. Public associations are one of the institutes of the civic society. Connection of the local government and public associations should be directed on the decision of the problems by municipality. We consider it is necessary to legislate forms and means of law connection local government and public associations.

Keywords: local government, public associations, uncommercial associations, connection, forms.

GORNEV Roman Vadimovich - Postgraduate student of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law of the Mari state university, Yoshkar-Ola.

Email: [email protected]

GORNEV Roman Vadimovich - Postgraduate Student of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law of Mari State University, Yoshkar-Ola.

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Students, graduate students, young scientists who use the knowledge base in their studies and work will be very grateful to you.

Posted on http://www.allbest.ru/

Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

State educational institution of higher professional education

Cheboksary Polytechnic Institute (branch)

Moscow State Open University

Test

by discipline: Municipal government

on the topic: Public associations and non-profit organizations in the local self-government system

Completed: 5th year student

Ivanova Ekaterina Valerievna

checked by: Golovina T.M.

Cheboksary 2013

Introduction

1. General concepts non-profit organization

2. Features of interaction between non-profit organizations and local governments

3.Forms of interaction and cooperation of local self-government bodies and non-profit organizations

Conclusion

Bibliography

Introduction

The most important role of local self-government in the modern state structure of the Russian Federation is determined by the fact that it protects the common interests of citizens living in urban, rural settlements, and other municipalities.

The presence of local self-government implies that in the country, along with the interests of the individual and the interests of the state, local (municipal) interests are also recognized and guaranteed - interests related to the solution of issues of direct support for the life of the population, and not the population in general, but the specific population of each individual city, settlement, village, stanitsa, aul, etc. At the same time, municipal interests are considered not as subordinate to the state interests, but as interests that are equal to them.

According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation (Article 12), local self-government is one of the most important constituent parts of the foundations of the constitutional system of the Russian Federation. It is recognized and guaranteed by the fundamental law of our state.

The system of local self-government in Russian municipalities is traditionally viewed as a set of organizational forms in which citizens exercise local self-government.

We have been observing restructuring processes for over ten years public relations in the system of local self-government, when the organized community not only claims a role in resolving issues of local importance, but also actively fulfills it. First of all, here we are talking about non-state / non-municipal non-profit organizations (hereinafter - NPO), created as a result of the self-organization of citizens.

The balance of power in the local self-government system has always been shifted towards local self-government bodies. It is to them, and not to the forms of direct democracy of the population, that the decisive role in the choice of directions for the development of the local self-government system is attributed. The opinion is expressed that "it is only thanks to them that the entire system of local self-government moves and develops, and that practically any impulse associated with the participation of the population or bodies of territorial public self-government in local self-government is mediated by the implementation of the corresponding powers of local self-government bodies."

However, local governments do not have the ability to resolve issues of local importance on their own. Against this background, the role of other actors is increasing, which can take on the solution of issues of local importance. In this case, we mean the activities of local NGOs, which, although legally are not an element of the local self-government system and are not even classified as other forms of public participation in local self-government, nevertheless, their obvious contribution to solving local issues prompts the sociologist to fix this phenomenon and identify their role as new elements of the local government system.

This test is devoted to the issues of interaction between NGOs and local self-government bodies, its forms and intensity.

1. General concepts of a non-profit organization

A non-profit organization (NPO) is an organization that does not have profit-making as the main goal of its activities and does not distribute the received profit among its participants.

If an NPO intends to act as a participant in civil law relations (acquire property rights and obligations), then it must go through the procedures state registration to acquire the rights of a legal entity.

The process of functioning of organizations in the non-profit sector is somewhat different from the activities of commercial organizations and includes two levels: main and entrepreneurial activities.

The main activity of an NPO is activity that corresponds to the goals for which this organization was created and which is provided for by its constituent documents. An NPO can carry out one or several types of activities.

Main business - main function NGOs. It is this activity of NPOs that is supported and stimulated by the state through the provision of privileges in paying taxes, receiving orders, etc. NPOs receive such benefits from the state in exchange for the obligations of the former to carry out their main activities, which in most cases boils down to the implementation of the most important social programs.

An NPO's entrepreneurial activity must meet three conditions:

1. should not be the main goal of the NPO's activities;

2. to serve the objectives of the organization, i.e. to strengthen its material and technical base, to be a source of formation of property used for the purposes of the organization, to attract members of the organization to work;

3. comply with the statutory goals of the organization and not go beyond its statutory legal capacity.

2. Peculiarities of interaction between non-profit organizations and local self-government bodies

The interaction of local self-government bodies and non-governmental non-profit organizations (NPOs) has a certain specificity in comparison with similar relations between NPOs and public authorities.

First, the area of activity of both interacting actors is local issues. On the one hand, the NGOs themselves, operating at the local level, are primarily aimed at meeting the needs of the population in the local self-government system. Almost two thirds (68%) of officials of local self-government bodies and municipal employees believe that it is local NPOs that play the most prominent role in the life of their municipalities, i.e. organizations operating within the territory of the local government. Every eighth respondent (12%) ascribes this role to regional organizations, every seventh (14%) - to branches of all-Russian public associations. On the other hand, municipal officials see the expediency of the participation of non-governmental non-profit organizations in solving most of the issues of local importance and, most often, in urban areas. Thus, in urban districts, all thirty questions of local importance are mentioned in this series, and only seven of them are mentioned less often than every tenth respondent. In them, most often, the expediency of NPO participation is noted in solving such issues of local importance as:

· Creation of conditions for organizing leisure and providing residents with services of cultural organizations (67%);

Providing conditions for the development of mass physical culture and sports (62%);

· Organization of landscaping and gardening of the territory, use and protection of urban forests (62%);

· Protection and preservation of cultural heritage sites (historical and cultural monuments) of local importance (59%);

· Creation of conditions for mass recreation and organization of arrangement of places for mass recreation of the population (59%);

Organization of security measures environment (56%).

A similar situation is developing in settlements - urban and rural. However, respondents rural settlements demonstrate less interest in the participation of NGOs in solving similar issues of local importance than in urban settlements.

Thus, officials of local self-government bodies and municipal employees most often see the expediency of NPO participation in resolving issues of local importance on the territory of cities - in urban districts and urban settlements. Moreover, at this level, the demand for NPO activities is more often expressed by respondents from urban districts.

The population of cities, villages and towns also assigns a certain role in solving their pressing problems to public and other non-profit organizations. The expected role of NGOs in addressing issues of improving the quality of human potential comes to the fore. So, their role is seen in solving the problems of drunkenness, alcoholism; the spread of drug addiction; falling morals, aggressiveness, indifference of people; an increase in the number of beggars, homeless people, vagrants, street children. In the first place is also the solution of problems of improvement, cleanliness of the city (village, town) by the efforts of public and other non-profit organizations. Next come the issues of ecology, environmental pollution. Every seventh considers organizations as subjects capable of contributing to improving the provision and increasing accessibility of cultural, entertainment, sports facilities.

Secondly, the nature of interaction between NPOs and local self-government bodies has specific features according to the types of municipalities. Differentiation of impressions from this interaction results in different assessments of the role that NGOs and civic initiatives play in the public life of municipalities. Thus, in general, every second respondent from among officials of local self-government bodies and municipal employees ascribes to them the role of an intermediary between the authorities and the population (more often respondents from urban districts and municipal districts). According to 45% of respondents, NGOs and civic initiatives help to catch interests and sentiments in time, which otherwise would result in non-constructive actions.

A similar tendency is observed in defining the role of a constructive opponent of the authorities, helping to see problems, bottlenecks, and shortcomings. In a number of cases, NGOs and civic initiatives help replace local authorities in resolving issues of local life. The role of NGOs and civic initiatives as assistants, partners and opponents is much more noticeable in urban districts than in rural settlements.

Apparently, these roles can be strengthened if stable relationships are established in the communication space "NGOs - local authorities". However, the lack of support and interest from local authorities is the main problem of the organization's functioning.

3.Forms of interaction and cooperation of local self-government bodies and non-profit organizations

self-government municipal non-profit

To what extent are various forms of interaction between local self-government bodies and NPOs, both material and intangible, widespread, which are really capable of contributing to increasing the sustainability of the functioning of NPOs?

The prevalence of these forms is markedly differentiated according to the types of municipalities. Most often, these forms are used in urban districts. For example, the provision of municipal grants takes place in every third urban district and only in every tenth municipal district. Among non-material forms of interaction, public councils are in the lead, as well as receiving information and methodological assistance by NGOs from the authorities.

Against the background of the limited spread of these forms of interaction, insufficient support of NGOs by local self-government bodies is also recorded.

Table 1. List of forms of support and cooperation of local self-government bodies with NGOs at the municipal level (by type of municipalities,%)

	Types of municipalities
	Urban districts	Municipal areas	Urban settlements	Rural settlements
Presentation of municipal granites
Placing a social order
Performance of work by NPOs under contracts with authorities that are not a social order
Participation of NGOs in public councils jointly with government authorities
Participation of NGOs in the implementation of municipal programs (without social order)
Participation of NGOs in joint working groups with government authorities, negotiation platforms, conciliation and conflict commissions
Representation of non-profit organizations with property support from the authorities
Obtaining information by NPOs from authorities
Providing information and analytics by NPOs to government authorities
Providing non-profit organizations with educational programs for municipal employees
Participation of NGOs in educational programs provided by government authorities
NGOs receiving methodological assistance from authorities
Providing NPOs with methodological assistance to authorities

This is evidenced by the ratio of the share of municipalities, which municipal officials name specific types of NGOs and civic initiatives as deserving support and as actually supported. In almost all positions, the share of municipalities in which these types of NGOs and civic initiatives deserve support. This does not apply only to religious communities, organizations and movements in which these shares practically coincide. The largest gap is observed in organizations created for self-organization in the housing sector: homeowners' associations (deserve support in 44% of municipalities, are actually supported - in 27%); territorial public self-governments (47% and 32%); house committees, elders at houses and at entrances (40% and 26%). Charitable organizations fall into the same category. They are followed in terms of the decreasing difference between deserving and really supported NGOs: garden and dacha associations, bodies of school and student government, consumer protection society.

Polls have shown that the most pressing support is veteran associations, disabled people's societies, women's organizations of the national-patriotic movement, etc.

In urban districts, more often than in other types of municipalities, respondents name most types of NPOs as deserving support.

Among NPOs, public associations most often enter into contacts with local self-government bodies. Most often, consumer cooperatives and autonomous non-profit organizations do not enter into such interaction. of all NPOs are involved in non-material forms of interaction with local government bodies.

Thus, NGOs in Russian municipalities could further strengthen their role in resolving issues of local importance, since the authorities themselves expect these actions from them (more often in urbanized areas). Interaction with local self-government bodies can become a serious resource for NPOs to develop and strengthen their sustainability. However, among the forms of interaction, non-material forms prevail, while institutionalization of material forms of interaction is of decisive importance to strengthen the subjective role in resolving issues of local importance. The situation by types of municipalities is not homogeneous. On the one hand, forms of interaction between local self-government bodies and NGOs are more common in urban districts. On the other hand, from the point of view of such interaction, specially identified types of municipalities that go beyond the four legally established types - urban districts, municipal districts, urban and rural settlements, are of interest. The use of this typology will make it possible to more deeply understand the essence of the types of interaction between local self-government bodies and NGOs in municipal Russia.

Public organization "Parents' Meeting": solving the problem of lack of kindergartens

Against the background of the general rise in civic activity, the topic of the lack of kindergartens is becoming very popular among citizens, many of whom are dealing with it directly. In many cities, initiative groups and public organizations are emerging that seek to solve problems by a variety of means - from rallies to mutual assistance among parents. Residents of Samara managed to advance the farthest - a public organization "Parents' Meeting" was created here.

The members of the organization believe that their main task is not protest actions - although they have nothing against those who conduct them - but the development of a dialogue with the authorities, on which the solution of the problem depends. Some kind of progress seems to be being noted. According to Nadezhda, it is felt that the officials understand the scale and urgency of the problem and are ready to look for ways to solve it. In recent years, 10 former kindergartens have been returned, which were occupied in the 90s. various organizations and institutions.

Conclusion

Local self-government bodies do not have the ability to resolve issues of local importance on their own. Against this background, the role of other actors is increasing, which can take on the solution of issues of local importance. In this case, we mean the activities of local NGOs, which, although legally are not an element of the local self-government system and are not even classified as other forms of public participation in local self-government, nevertheless, their obvious contribution to resolving issues of local importance prompts to record this phenomenon and identify their role as new elements of the local government system.

A non-profit organization is an organization that does not have profit-making as the main goal of its activities and does not distribute the received profit among its participants.

NPOs can be created in the form of public or religious organizations (associations), non-profit partnerships, institutions, autonomous NPOs, social, charitable and other foundations, associations and unions, as well as in other forms provided for by federal laws.

The activities of NGOs to resolve issues of local importance are expected and in demand on the part of officials of local self-government bodies and municipal employees. This contributes to the strengthening of the position of local NPOs as real elements of the local self-government system, which can potentially acquire an important feature of an institutional nature - legal registration. The sustainability of the non-profit sector at the local level could be facilitated by the forms of interaction between the authorities and the public. However, their potential has not yet been fully explored. In this regard, it becomes necessary to develop measures to support NPOs on the part of local self-government bodies, which will ultimately help to strengthen the systems of local self-government for managing the processes associated with its life support.

Bibliography

1. The Civil Code of the Russian Federation, Part 1.

2. Uvarov A.L. Local government in Russia. - 3rd ed., Revised. M .: Norma, 2008.

3. Mersiyanova I.V. Issues of state and municipal administration, 2008.

Posted on Allbest.ru

...

Recommended list of dissertations

Foundations, principles and mechanisms of intersectoral social partnership in Russia 2002, Doctor of Sociological Sciences Yakimets, Vladimir Nikolaevich
Interaction of non-governmental non-profit organizations with state authorities and administration in Russia 2004, candidate of political sciences Batalova, Yulia Vladimirovna
2003, candidate of economic sciences Tadorashko, Konstantin Pavlovich
2000, candidate of sociological sciences Khukhlina, Valentina Vladimirovna
2008, candidate of political sciences Shock, Natalia Petrovna

Dissertation introduction (part of the abstract) on the topic "The role of public organizations in the activities of local self-government bodies"

Russia is following the path of socio-economic transformations, and many researchers associate their progress with the construction or development of civil society.

Both scientists and practical leaders, political and public figures are giving serious attention to the problem of forming a civil society in Russia. It has become an integral part of modern ideas about society, democracy, and the rule of law.

The formation of civil society is reflected in many program documents of the state and government, political parties and movements.

Civil society grows out of society's needs in overcoming antagonism and contradictions, reconciling and harmonizing social forces.

The main meaning and its direction lies in the realization of the destiny of a person in his concrete historical and nationally specific conditions, including the expression of his individual strengths and abilities, the "highest" manifestation of which is civic qualities.

Achievement of civil society is carried out in two ways - independence of actions and interaction. The first method means that to combine different interests, autonomy and independence, self-control of the subjects are necessary, and on the other hand, the relationship of subjects striving for such unity is possible only on the basis of combining efforts on the basis of cooperation.

Public associations are the central component of civil society. It is here that the direct and real ties between society and the state, the individual and the government, are realized, the rights and freedoms of the individual, their initiative and independence are realized, the level and nature of democracy, the fullness of the meaning of human existence as such, are manifested.

According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, public associations are intermediaries between society and the state. The objective possibilities of transforming our society into a civil democratic society are concentrated here, therefore, the development of the problem of social partnership in the interaction of municipal authorities, as local governments and non-profit organizations, is relevant and timely.

The emergence of a market economy in Russia led to a sharp drop in the living standards of the population, to the stratification of society, to a crisis in the social sphere of the state. In this situation, the problem of creating a strong state social policy is especially acute.

In modern Russia, it is necessary to create such living conditions for the population that would meet the interests and needs of every Russian citizen. Achievement of this goal is associated, first of all, with the territorial community of cohabitation of people, where livelihoods are provided by local municipal authorities, capable of creating conditions for social harmony and social partnership of people living in this territory.

Solving the problem of reaching agreement, dialogue, cooperation, partnership between various social strata, between local governments and public organizations is an extremely important and urgent task of the modern stage of the historical development of our society.

The relevance of the dissertation is to reveal in the system of relations between the population and local authorities the prerequisites for constructive contacts for cooperation, mutual consideration of the interests of the subjects social interaction, in the search and finding mutually acceptable solutions on the issues of the population's life. The readiness of the municipal authorities for social cooperation with public organizations is the main condition and guarantee of social stability in society.

Within the framework of the social crisis experienced by Russian society, the problem of social partnership between the state and the non-profit sector becomes urgent, especially at the lower level of government, which is closest to the population and is most closely connected with it.

The basis of social partnership at the local level is self-government, which is characteristic of both local authorities and public associations, which creates additional conditions for their interaction.

An equally important factor in the development of social partnership is the social activity of the individual and the need for the manifestation of personal initiative in the implementation of social policy. It is necessary to activate the population to participate in the activities of public associations as a means of expressing citizenship and an instrument of influence on the adoption of managerial decisions in social policy.

The creation of conditions conducive to the formation and development of social partnership, the study of ways and methods of its practical implementation at the local level contributes to the development of the democratic functions of society, its advancement on the path of democratization and the building of civil society, which is extremely important for Russian reality.

The study of the role of public organizations in the process of solving social problems at the level of local government, modeling social technologies, within the framework of which a constructive connection of state and public methods of responding to social problems is achieved, is becoming an important area of sociological science.

The relevance of a sociological study of the development of the non-profit sector and its increasing influence on the formation of social policy at the local level is that it makes it possible to develop proposals for enhancing the interaction of public organizations and local governments in the social sphere and to develop proposals for attracting the population to participate in resolving issues of its life ...

The degree of scientific elaboration of the problem. The categorical and conceptual apparatus, the interpretation of the definitions of social partnership require methodological clarity. Currently, most Russian researchers consider social partnership as a form of social and labor relations between employees and employers.

Non-governmental organizations that offer their initiative, often free of charge, thus do not fit methodologically into the context of the functioning generally accepted concept of "social partnership"

The new emerging practice of public relations at the local level, the social partnership of municipal bodies and the public sector, methodologically and theoretically requires clarification. ^

The author proceeds from the assumption that social partnership means the relationship between the state, which is represented by the government, its bodies and representatives (in the work under consideration, represented by local self-government bodies) with other subjects - an individual, family, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), etc. Social partnership is an equal relationship between subjects, which are determined by the commonality of their needs, value orientations and interests based on the principle of social justice. The dissertation examines: the interaction of state authorities at the local level with non-governmental organizations, the role of self-government in the activities of local authorities and public organizations, current trends in the development of the non-profit sector and its increasing role in the formation of civil society.

The various directions of development, formation and interaction of non-governmental organizations with local authorities are considered in the works of domestic researchers: Mitrokhin V.I., Yashchenko AA, Ionova JI.A., Vilinova I.V., Savchenko P.V., Yakimets V.V. N., Model I.M., Model B.S., Kiseleva V.N., Smolnova V.G., Migirova R.P., Konovalova JI. Fedulina A. et al. 1

An analysis of the works of the above authors allows us to conclude that a distinctive feature of Russian reality is the insufficient formation of partners of social relations, both on the part of state authorities and on the part of NGOs interacting with them. The state policy in relation to social partnership with NGOs in Russia is in the process of formation. Social partnership, as a backbone of civil society, is in its infancy and so far weakly acts as a shock absorber of social tension in society. Naturally, an important task is to develop clear, conceptual guidelines, substantiate an effective model of social partnership between the state represented by local government and non-profit, non-governmental organizations (hereinafter NGOs), proposals and recommendations for the formation of state social policy in these areas. Part of the state social policy is the development of favorable conditions for the development of two components of social partnership: the system of local self-government - local authorities and the non-governmental sector - public associations. In the opinion of the candidate for a degree, what is common in the works under consideration is the analysis of the development trend of the nongovernmental sector. Researchers note an increase social role NGOs caused by the inability of the state to fully meet the needs of the population in social services. Involvement of NGOs in social activities reduces the burden on the state and increases

Matyukhin A.B. The concept of political modernization of Russian society. Diss., M., 1998; Kisilev V.N., Smolnov V.G. Social partnership in Russia. M., 1998; Semigin G.Yu. Social partnership as a sector of political stabilization of Russian society. Abstract dissertation. M., 1993; Ionova O.B. Social technology partnership. M., 2000; P.V. Savchenko Non-profit organizations in the system of institutional relations M ,. 2000; Model I.M., Model B.S. Power and civil society in Russia: from social interaction to social partnership. Yekaterinburg, 1998; Vilinov I.E. Formation of a system of social partnership. Abstract dissertation. M., 1998; Trubitsin A.B. Social policy: towards the development of new guidelines. M., 2000; L. Konovalova Non-governmental organizations in the state and society M., 2000; M. Kleinberg Non-profit public organizations in the Russian sector social security... M., 2000. the scope of NGOs. The social sphere is the field where objective necessity contributes to the emergence of effective and full-fledged social partnership between NGOs and state authorities.

In the presented dissertation work, the social partnership between non-governmental, non-profit organizations and local authorities is investigated in solving problem situations in the social sphere based on the experience of cooperation of the Regional Public Charitable Organization (hereinafter ROBO "KCSP") with the Krasnoselsky District Administration.

The problems of local self-government have been studied quite deeply both in Russia and abroad.

The search for theoretical and practical solutions in this direction is an important and urgent problem of today. This is evidenced by the works of I. Babichev, A. Voronin, A. Gladyshev, V. Golovanov, P. Biryukov, J1. Gilchenko, I. Ovchinnikova, E. Zaborova, et al. 2 These works provide an analysis of common problems development of self-government at the levels: state, regional and municipal, local; the interaction of various levels of government, their role in the formation of a democratic society in Russia is considered.

A number of works analyze the problems of legal regulation of the activities of local authorities from the point of view of the function of self-government. Recently, studies have appeared on the role of local authorities in the political and economic development of regions, but there are no works that, to one degree or another, cover the entire range of social issues related to the social partnership of non-governmental organizations and local authorities as an institution of self-government.

The practice of developing social activity poses tasks for sociological science and requires a theoretical study of the contradiction between the needs of society for an effective social partnership between local governments and NGOs and the real state of this partnership is not appropriate

1 1 - " 1 "" - .

I. Babichev Subjects of local self-government and their interaction. M., 2000; Voronin A.G. and etc.

Editorial board / Local government in the Russian Federation. M., 1998; A. Gladyshev Local community development: theory, methodology, practice. M., 1999; V. Golovanov Management and self-government in a large city M., 1997; P. Biryukov Fundamentals of local government and self-government M., 1998; J1. Gilchenko Local Self-Government: A Long Return: The Formation of Local Self-Government in Russia. M., 1998; I. Ovchinnikov Local self-government in the system of democracy. M., 1999; Zaborova E.H. The system of self-government and territorial self-activity of the urban population, Yekaterinburg, 1998. The requirements of today and the goals of building a civil society in our country.

The purpose of the thesis is to study the patterns of the emergence and development of social partnership between local governments represented by local authorities and the public non-governmental sector, development practical recommendations to stimulate and optimize this process in the social sphere. Determination of the place and role of non-governmental organizations in the formation of civil society in Russia at the level of local self-government.

The statement tasks of the thesis are:

Analysis of social partnership as a system of interaction between public authorities and non-governmental organizations;

Clarification of the concept of "local self-government" in relation to local authorities - municipalities, within the city of Moscow - to boards;

Analysis of the modern concept and model of interaction of local government bodies as local government with non-governmental organizations;

Substantiation of the role of the "third sector" and local government in the formation of civil society in Russia;

Conducting a sociological analysis of social partnership between local authorities and public organizations on the example of the Krasnoselsky district of Moscow and, on its basis, substantiating the increasing role of non-governmental organizations and social partnership between local self-government bodies and non-profit organizations at the present stage of development of Russian society;

The objects of research are local government, non-governmental non-profit organizations, their interaction in the social sphere.

The subject of the research is social partnership as a system of interaction between local government and public associations.

The theoretical and methodological basis of the dissertation research includes theoretical developments leading Russian and Western sociologists in the study and development of the concept of social partnership between the state and non-governmental organizations; its influence on the formation of civil society, the role of public organizations in the activities of local authorities, research materials, scientific and practical conferences, the provisions of legislative and regulatory acts.

The work uses a sociological research method using theoretical and methodological analysis systemic concepts research. The author developed questionnaires and under his leadership conducted a sociological survey of 300 residents and 300 experts (heads of state, commercial, public organizations, employees of the Administration and its services). The sample is representative.

Research hypothesis: the formation of a civil society in Russia is impossible without solving the fundamental problem of social partnership of local authorities with non-governmental organizations representing the interests of a huge number of the population.

The scientific novelty of the dissertation is as follows:

The domestic experience of interaction between municipal authorities as local self-government bodies and non-governmental organizations represented by public associations is generalized. On the basis of this generalization, for the first time, the process of evolution of the concept of "local self-government" is presented, including from the standpoint of its inclusion in the content of management at the local state level and the analysis of common and different features inherent in the self-government of local authorities and self-government of public associations;

Empirical data have been introduced into scientific circulation, deepening the concept of social partnership between state authorities and non-governmental organizations as a new social institution that actively contributes to the formation of civil society in Russia;

On the basis of the analysis of sociological research, a mechanism for increasing the role of the non-governmental sector in the activities of local self-government has been substantiated;

The specifics and mechanisms of interaction between state authorities and non-governmental organizations at the lowest level of government are analyzed;

Based sociological survey the difficulties and problems of the development of social partnership at the local level between state authorities and public organizations are identified, due, on the one hand, to the socio-economic situation in the country, the unpreparedness of civil servants for social dialogue, social partnership, imperfection of the legislative framework, unsatisfactory state information field, and on the other hand, weak involvement of the population itself in self-governing public associations and their insufficient participation in decision-making processes at the state level;

Proposed efficient models introduction and development of social partnership between state authorities and public organizations in the social sphere of services for privileged categories of residents.

The practical significance of the work is determined by the need to comprehend the creative role of social partnership between local governments and non-profit organizations, which is necessary for the development of the social sphere, for the prompt solution of social problems. Participation of the population in management activities, in the preparation and decision-making on the planning and implementation of social policy at the local level.

The practical significance of this study is due to the content of proposals and recommendations for the formation effective system social partnership between local authorities and non-governmental organizations, to involve the population in active participation in the implementation of social policy at the local level.

The conclusions and provisions of the dissertation can be used in the development of a regulatory and legislative framework for the development of social partnership, in the training of management personnel at various levels, in the activities of non-governmental organizations entering into social partnership with local government bodies, in the work of local self-government bodies to attract the population to active participation in public life.

The empirical base of the study was the data of official statistics, including the city statistical office of Moscow, materials of the Krasnoselsky Administration and the results of sociological research conducted by the author. The main regulatory sources were: the regulatory framework for non-profit organizations, social partnership, self-government in Russia and Moscow, the European Charter of Local Self-Government, the Constitution of the Russian Federation.

Approbation of work and implementation of research results. The main conclusions of the idea and thesis of the dissertation work are based on 10 years of practical experience of the author as the head of the public charitable organization "Coordination Center for Social Support", which implements in practice the mechanism of social partnership with local authorities represented by the Krasnoselsky District Administration. This experience was reviewed and approved by the Moscow Mayor's Office.

The provisions of the dissertation are set out by the author in publications and speeches at "round tables", in the work of the scientific-practical conference "The role of non-governmental organizations in the activities of state authorities" in 1998, Central Administrative District, Moscow, hearings in the State Duma in April 2002, in materials prepared by the Krasnoselsky Board for the Administration of the Central District, as well as in three publications with a volume of more than 5 pp.

The main provisions of the dissertation were discussed at a meeting of the Department of Sociology of the Social Sphere of the STI MGUS.

Provisions for Defense:

Self-government is a basic principle of local authorities and public organizations that regulates the right of citizens to independently manage local affairs and is a way of organizing and participating in the exercise of local power.

Self-government, non-profit sector, social partnership are the main, defining institutions of civil society, allowing the most effective use of public potential in the management of society.

Civil initiatives are the very element of "social capital", without which the effective development of society and a democratic state is inconceivable.

The involvement of the public sector in the provision of social services on the basis of social partnership with local authorities is a new phenomenon in the social sphere of Russia, contributing to the development of democracy in society.

Lack of a holistic, complex and systemic public policy in the field of social dialogue and social partnership between the authorities and NGOs, which includes all the necessary components: legal, organizational and structural, scientific and methodological, material and financial and informational, restrain the development of Russian society.

Based on the experience of social partnership between local authorities and public organizations in the provision of social services, the reality of social cooperation in solving the most acute social problems of the most needy groups of the population has been proved.

A successful social partnership between government authorities and NGOs working in the field of social services depends on the following factors:

The presence of a targeted state policy in the field of social partnership with the "third sector";

Formation of the legislative framework, including in taxation, which stimulates government and commercial structures to cooperate with NGOs;

Coordination of efforts of NGOs and state structures in the social sphere of activity;

Information support for the processes of social partnership, promoting the ideas of the "third sector" and social partnership in the minds of people,

From subjective factors, i.e. from the level of competence and responsibility staff government leaders and leaders of non-governmental organizations.

The structure of the thesis. The work consists of an introduction, two chapters, a conclusion, a bibliography and annexes.

Similar dissertations in the specialty "Sociology of Management", 22.00.08 code VAK

2009, Doctor of Political Science Vasilieva, Tatiana Alekseevna
Institutionalization of Intersectoral Social Partnership: Regional Aspect: The Case of the Republic of Buryatia 2006, candidate of sociological sciences Chernobrovkina, Elena Pavlovna
Non-profit organizations in regional policy: the case of the Far Eastern Federal District of the Russian Federation 2010, candidate of political sciences Kiyashko, Evgeniya Yurievna
Interaction of local governments, public organizations and business as a form of social partnership 2009, candidate of sociological sciences Lovkova, Anastasia Anatolyevna
Institutional and economic foundations of the development of civil society in Russia 2008, candidate of economic sciences Kovalev, Alexander Petrovich

Conclusion of the thesis on the topic "Sociology of Management", Botu, Irina Anatolyevna

CONCLUSION

In the process of working on the problem "The role of public organizations in the activities of local self-government bodies" the author considered a large set of tasks, which made it possible to:

Study the available materials (legislative and regulatory acts, documents of authorities, scientific publications, materials of periodicals, etc.), on the methodology, theory and practice of public policy on this issue; consider the conceptual apparatus and conceptual approaches to the problem;

To study foreign experience in solving this problem (on the example of Western European countries) and the experience of NGO development, its role in reforming society in Russia;

Assess the actions of local governments to establish social partnership with public organizations at the local level, assess the role of NGOs in the development of local governments, analyze the results of joint work of the Administration with NGOs based on the work of the public charitable organization "Coordination Center for Social Support";

To develop proposals allowing, in the author's opinion, to increase the role of public organizations in their cooperation with local self-government bodies.

Thus, we can draw conclusions:

A social portrait of interaction between local self-government bodies and organizations of the "third sector" has been created.

It has been established that the foundation of a democratic civil society is being laid at the local level, and social partnership of local self-government bodies and NGOs is the way to its formation.

It has been determined that the non-profit non-governmental sector is a significant and dynamically developing component of public life. It not only serves to meet the urgent needs of people, but also represents a powerful and growing economic force that affects all aspects of social life.

At the local level, the mechanisms for the participation of non-governmental organizations in the implementation of state social policy have not fully developed as a generally accepted practice. Subjective factors that influence the interaction of NGOs with state structures in solving problems of the social sphere retain a significant role, and therefore, this interaction cannot be called stable. The information field for the development of NGOs and social cooperation is narrowed and poorly developed. The potential of the information component of social policy in the field of social partnership is not fully used, which hinders the development of the process. Purposeful work is needed to form public opinion in favor of social partnership, its development.

The development of social partnership between local self-government bodies and non-governmental organizations largely depends on the initiative and activity of third sector organizations. Ability to attract additional funding, professionalism of personnel working in NGOs, independence and a high degree of responsibility for the quality of solutions to the problem and the completeness of the obligations assumed, the ability to express and lobby their interests and the interests of citizens at the level of acceptance government decisions, in particular at the local government level, determine the success of such actions.

It was revealed that many problems of the "third sector", especially at the local level, are associated with the lack of a sufficiently developed and effective legal framework... The existing legislative framework does not cover the entire field of activity of the nongovernmental sector, social partnership between state authorities, the commercial sector and nongovernmental organizations. Regulatory acts already in force require revision and improvement. The process of developing the legal framework at the local level is in its infancy and requires revitalization and expansion.

Shows the leading role of the state in the emerging civil society, in the formation and development of social partnership. The state develops the strategy and priorities of social policy, organizes their practical implementation with the participation of social partners in accordance with established norms.

The main importance and role of NGOs in building civil society has been determined. The development of NGOs determines the democratic development of the state. They exercise control over the activities of public authorities, providing citizens with the opportunity to participate in the management of the processes taking place in society.

In the course of the sociological study, the hypothesis was confirmed that the formation of a civil society in Russia is impossible without solving the fundamental problem of social partnership of local governments with non-governmental non-profit organizations. The development of NGOs determines the democratic development of the state. They exercise control over the activities of public authorities, provide citizens with the opportunity to participate in the management of the processes taking place in society.

The success of the formation of social partnership between state authorities and non-governmental organizations and the business sector largely depends on the solution of these issues at the “grassroots” level, at the level of administrations in Moscow. It is at this level that the simplest and most effective forms of interaction between the authorities and the public arise.

The main conditions for the formation and development of social partnership of local self-government bodies and non-profit organizations are formulated, the primary task of which is to develop a concept of a competent social policy, which provides for measures to develop the "third sector", enhance its role in the development of civil society in the country, increase citizens' participation in governance the vital activity of the population.

The model of organizational development of social partnership of public organizations with local self-government bodies is proposed, which provides for measures to support non-profit organizations. To create a truly sustainable and functioning "third sector", it is necessary governmental support, including financial, investments in education and training of personnel working in the "third sector".

It was revealed that at the local level, mechanisms for the participation of non-governmental organizations in the implementation of state social policy have not fully developed as a generally accepted practice. Subjective factors that influence the interaction of NGOs with state structures in solving problems of the social sphere retain a significant role, and therefore, this interaction cannot be called stable.

Social partnership between non-governmental organizations and state authorities is a dialectical, developing process. Social relations in society are changing, the role of the state is changing, the role of public organizations is changing. This process cannot be called permanent at the present time; rather, it has a discrete nature, extremely susceptible to subjective factors. It will take the efforts of all stakeholders in order to successfully develop, so that the process of developing social partnership becomes irreversible and generally recognized.

An important task is the development of social partnership of the public sector with local governments in the social sphere, where the capabilities of non-profit organizations to relieve social tension, use the social capital of citizens are fully manifested, the basic qualities of the “third sector” are realized: mutual assistance, solidarity, humanity, etc. etc.

It shows the need to create appropriate structures within government departments to communicate with NGOs, without which it is impossible and ineffective to maintain a constant dialogue with society.

Social partnership between non-governmental organizations and state authorities is a dialectical and developing process. Social relations in society are changing, the role of the state is changing, the role of public organizations is changing. This process cannot be called permanent at the present time; rather, it has a discrete nature, extremely susceptible to subjective factors. It will take the efforts of all stakeholders to successfully develop cooperation of all three sectors of the economy, so that the process of developing social partnership becomes irreversible and generally recognized.

It is public associations, nongovernmental organizations in general, their interaction with local self-government bodies focused on "social partnership" that can and should become the main principle of combining the efforts of the state and citizens in solving the problems of society development. Non-governmental organizations can become a very effective reserve for enhancing the activities of self-government and administration bodies in implementing programs for the socio-economic development of a district, region, city, creating a climate of trust and harmony, and improving society.

List of dissertation research literature Botsu, candidate of sociological sciences, Irina Anatolyevna, 2002

1. Avakyan S.A. State, problems and prospects of local self-government in Russia // Local self-government in Russia: state, problems, prospects: Mater, scientific. Conf M., 1994

2. Avtonomov A.S., Zakharov A.A., Kazakova E.Yu., et al. Local self-government in modern Russia: the rights, duties and activities of representative bodies of power, Intern. rep. int, Foundation for the Development of Parliamentarism in Russia. M., Ves Mir, 1999.79 p.

3. Anikin E.M. Local self-government can become an interactive social management // Bulletin of the Russian Institute of Friendship of Peoples. M., 2001, No. 1 S. 56-61.

4. Animitsa E.G., Tertyshny A.T. Local self-government: history and modernity Yekaterinburg, 1998, 295 p.

5. Antipyev A.G., Zakharov N.H., Shishigin A.B., Local government, socio-political institution of civil society. Perm: Publishing house Perm. state University, 1999.130 p.

6. Arkhangelsky V.N. Economics of innovation in small organizational forms. Textbook. manual. M. Publishing house of RAGS 1997.78 p.

7. Atamanchuk G.V. Ensuring the rationality of public administration. M. 1990.

8. Afanasyev V.G. Scientific management of society. M., 1968.

9. Babich A.M. and others. The economic mechanism in non-profit organizations AGS. M., 1993.170 p.

10. Babichev I.V. Subjects of local self-government and their interaction M., Vost.bezh, 2000.207 p.

11. Babun R.V., Map'kovets N.V. The government closest to the people (On local self-government for all) A manual for the population and societies, organiz. / Assoc. Siberia. and Far Eastern cities. Novosibirsk. 2000.115 s.

12. Barabashev G.V. Local self-government is a difficult child of Russia today! // Russian Journal of Self-Government, 1992 No. 1 p. 48-51.

13. Bakhrakh D.N. Administrative law... M., 1993.

14. Belotserkovsky V. Self-government is the future of mankind or a new utopia? M., Inter-Verso: International Relations, 1992 p. 159.

15. Belykh A.K. Management and self-government. Socialist management: essence and development prospects. L., Nauka, 1972.209 p.

16. Biryukov PP, Fundamentals of local government and self-government M., IM-Inform, 1998. 136 p.

17. Bobryshev D.N. The main categories of management. Tutorial. M., ANKh, 1988.

18. Bolshakov V.Yu. / ed. Society and politics: modern research, search for the concept of St. Petersburg. St. Petersburg, 2000.

19. Big explanatory sociological dictionary T. 1-2 M., 1999.

20. Borodkin F.M. The values of the population and the possibilities of local self-government. // Sociological research, 1997. No. 1 p. 98-111.

21. Borodkin F.M. Third (non-profit) sector of society // State of the third (non-profit) sector in society: expert articles. Novosibirsk, 1996.76 p.

22. Borisov V.A. Social partnership in Russia: specificity or substitution of concepts? M. 2001.

23. Bryachikhin A.M. Power in the city. M. Knowledge, 1995.

24. Bulysova E. Social partnership as a system for resolving conflicts in the field of social and labor relations in Russia. Abstract of Cand. dissertation. M, 2000

25. Burlatsky F.M. State and communism. M.,: Sotsekgiz, 1963.247 p.

26. Burov A.N. Local self-government in Russia: historical traditions and modern practice. Rostov n /, Publishing house Rost. State University, 2000.233 p.

27. Vasiliev V.N. Analysis of the results of a sociological survey of the population and representatives executive power Of the Leningrad region on local self-government. M., 1999.65 p.

28. Weber M. Selected Works. M., 1990.

29. Velikhov L.A. Basics of urban economy. General teaching about the city, its management, finance and local economy. M-L., State Publishing House, 1928.

30. Vilinov I.E. Formation of a system of social partnership Abstract dis. Academy of Labor and Social Relations, M., 1998.20 p.

31. Power, NGOs and the press in the regions of Russia: opposition or interaction. / Regional press of Russia and structures of civil society. M., 1999.

32. Volkov Yu.E. This is how communist self-government is born (the experience of concrete sociological research) M., Mysl. 1965.240 s.

33. Voronin A.G., Murashko A.F., Genisaretskiy O.I. et al. Local self-government in modern Russia M., 1998. 240 p. (Scientific report of societies, scientific fund, No. 50)

34. Gavra D.P. Social institutions // Socio-political journal, 1998 №2. with. 123-132.

35. Gladkov A.P. Analysis of the current situation in the development of local self-government on the example of the Astrakhan region M., 2000, 4.2 234 p.

36. Gladyshev A.G. Municipal formation: strategies and technologies for anti-crisis development. M., 1997.

37. Gladyshev A.G. Legal foundations of local self-government. M., Slavic Dialogue, 1996.

38. Gilchenko L., Local government: a long return: Formation of local government in Russia / Mosk. public scientific. fund M., 1998.109 p.

39. Gilchenko L. Zigzags of reform // Russian Federation, 1996. №8. with. 26-27.

40. Gleason G., Management: The Public Sector in the Process of Change / Per. from English Ponizovkina E.G., Yekaterinburg, 1998.102 p.

41. Glukhov A.B. Local government in the transition to a democratic organization of society (on the example of Russia). Abstract of dissertation. M., 1997.25 p.

42. Golikova G.G. Local self-government in the Russian Federation: experience and problems // Synergetics in modern world; Sat. materials international, scientific. confer. in the city of Belgorod. Belgorod, 2001 43 p.

43. Golovanov V.I. Management of sustainable development of the district in the city of Moscow. M., Science, 1996.

44. V. V. Goncharov. The Quest for Management Excellence: A Guide for Senior Management. M., MP "Souvenir", 1994.

45. State and administrative structure of Germany. Munich-Bonn, 1994.

46. State and non-governmental organizations: social partnership and social dialogue of the Far East. cities. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk. state acad. Economics and Management, 2000.115 p.

47. Humanism in practice M., MGSU and CSO "Ramenki" M., 1995. 120 p.

48. Danilov F.A. State power and local (city and zemstvo) self-government. M., 1907.71 p.

49. Dakhin A.B. ed. State and development trends of municipal self-government in Russia and the Republic of Korea, comparative approaches, Inform. bull. SEC SENEX. Jan. July 2000 N. Novgorod, 2000.181s.

50. Drago R. Administrative Science. M., Progress, 1982.

51. Dylnov G.V. Local government in the system of government of the Russian Federation // Problems of local government // Local government. Political science approach. Sat. scientific. tr. / Ed. V.M.Dolgov. Saratov, 1994. p. 47-53.

53. Zaborova E.H. The system of self-government and territorial independence of the urban population // Region. Economy and region. Politics, Yekaterinburg. Issue 4

54. Zinoviev A.P. Political parties and public associations of industrialists and entrepreneurs of Russia at the turn of the XIX XX centuries: textbook. / State. un-t. ex. M., 2000.116 p.

55. Znamenskaya K.N. Formation of the mechanism of municipal management at the level of the administrative district of a large city. SPb., 1994.

56. Zotova V.B., Porshneva A.G. Ways of solving municipal government: Sat. Art. / Muniz. acad state upr., M., Prima-Press-M, 1999. Issue. 1.232 p.

57. Zotova Z.M. scientific. hands. and compiler., Proceedings of the conference Actual problems of reform of local government in modern Russia ", M., 1998. 181 p.

58. Ivanov L.V.-otv. Ed. The role of territorial public self-government in the formation of the urban community: Tez nauch. practical Conf., Tver, 1999.183 p.

59. Ivanova JT.A. Actual problems of the development of social partnership in the Republic of Mordovia in modern conditions Saransk. 2001.243 s.

60. Ignatov V.G., Khoperskaya L.L., Ponedelkov A.B. State power and local government: efficiency and responsibility. Rostov on / D., 1998.148 p.

61. From the practice of the parliaments of the leading Western countries ITAR TAC, 1993

62. Institutions of power in France. M., 1995

63. Ionova O.B. Social technologies of partnership I Vestnik Mosk. Univer.-that. Ser. 18 Sociology and Political Science. No. 4. M. 2000.

64. Kennedy L.W. Quality management in a non-profit area. S. Petersburg. Education. 1994.175 s.

65. Kisilev V.N., Smolnov V.G. Social partnership in Russia. M., 1998.

66. Klimenko S.V., Chicherin A.L. Foundations of state and law. M., 1996

67. Kleineberg M., Non-profit public organizations in the Russian sector of social security // Zhurn. sociol. and social. anthropology 2000.Vol. 3, 3 1 pp. 134-153.

68. Kogut A.B. Local government system. SPb., 1995.62 p.

69. Kokotov A.N. On the legalization of public organizations Yekaterinburg Sverdlovsk Law Institute, 1993.5 p.

70. Konovalova L., Non-governmental organizations in the state and society, I. M., 2000.

71. Koh I.A. Personnel potential and socio-ethical problems of formation and development: Abstracts. report Urals. scientific. practical conf. Perm, 1998, p. 82-87.73.

Please note that the above scientific texts are posted for review and obtained by means of recognition of the original texts of dissertations (OCR). In this connection, they may contain errors associated with the imperfection of recognition algorithms. There are no such errors in PDF files of dissertations and abstracts that we deliver.

Local self-government bodies, public associations. Interaction of local self-government bodies with public and other associations of citizens, citizens and business entities. V. Powers of public associations under

Send your good work in the knowledge base is simple. Use the form below

Similar documents

Recommended list of dissertations

Foundations, principles and mechanisms of intersectoral social partnership in Russia 2002, Doctor of Sociological Sciences Yakimets, Vladimir Nikolaevich

Interaction of non-governmental non-profit organizations with state authorities and administration in Russia 2004, candidate of political sciences Batalova, Yulia Vladimirovna

2003, candidate of economic sciences Tadorashko, Konstantin Pavlovich

2000, candidate of sociological sciences Khukhlina, Valentina Vladimirovna

2008, candidate of political sciences Shock, Natalia Petrovna

Dissertation introduction (part of the abstract) on the topic "The role of public organizations in the activities of local self-government bodies"

Similar dissertations in the specialty "Sociology of Management", 22.00.08 code VAK

2009, Doctor of Political Science Vasilieva, Tatiana Alekseevna

Institutionalization of Intersectoral Social Partnership: Regional Aspect: The Case of the Republic of Buryatia 2006, candidate of sociological sciences Chernobrovkina, Elena Pavlovna

Non-profit organizations in regional policy: the case of the Far Eastern Federal District of the Russian Federation 2010, candidate of political sciences Kiyashko, Evgeniya Yurievna

Interaction of local governments, public organizations and business as a form of social partnership 2009, candidate of sociological sciences Lovkova, Anastasia Anatolyevna

Institutional and economic foundations of the development of civil society in Russia 2008, candidate of economic sciences Kovalev, Alexander Petrovich

Conclusion of the thesis on the topic "Sociology of Management", Botu, Irina Anatolyevna

List of dissertation research literature Botsu, candidate of sociological sciences, Irina Anatolyevna, 2002