Planning Motivation Control

Moscow city competition of professional skills of teachers of additional education "res. Conducting professional skills competitions using the WorldSkills methodology on the example of pedagogical specialties

In conditions market economy increasing value professional excellence workers and the need for highly qualified competitive professionals. Currently, the main criteria for assessing the quality of graduate training are the presence of not only professional knowledge, skills and abilities, but also professional and general competences... One of effective ways increasing competence, enhancing the cognitive activity of students are becoming competitions of professional skills. Professional skill contests create optimal conditions for the creative self-realization of the individual, his professional and social adaptation, for the formation of a competitive specialist.

Download:


Preview:

In a market economy, the importance of professional skills of workers and the need for highly qualified competitive specialists are increasing.

The main result of the system of secondary vocational education, is a highly competent worker, ready for social and professional mobility, continuous education, self-development and self-improvement of their competencies, accelerated assimilation of innovations, quick adaptation to the needs and requirements of a dynamically changing world. Currently, the main criteria for assessing the quality of a graduate's training are the presence of not only professional knowledge, skills and abilities, but also professional and general competencies. However, despite the ongoing changes in vocational education, a number of problems can be identified in the system of training specialists.

One of the most important among them is the problem of incompetence of graduates of secondary vocational education: they cannot quickly adapt to changes in society, do not use the latest educational technologies in their work, and cannot fully analyze their own professional activities.

One of the reasons for the incompetence of graduates is the lack of interest in the profession and in learning activities generally. Teachers educational institutions secondary vocational education ask how to raise the level of motivation of educational and, including independent, creative activity of students. High appreciation, praise from the teacher, victory in the competition - they really bring satisfaction and are a good reward for the work, for the time and effort spent.

Thus, one of the most effective ways to increase the motivation for learning, to enhance the cognitive activity of students is professional skill contests. Conducting a professional skills competition is a fascinating form of competition among students. Students learn to organize their own activities, choose typical methods and ways of performing professional tasks, assessing their effectiveness and quality. Make decisions in standard and non-standard situations and be responsible for them. Search and use the information necessary for the effective performance of professional tasks, professional and personal development. It is the professional skill contests that create optimal conditions for the creative self-realization of the individual, his professional and social adaptation.

All groups of one profession participate in the professional skills competition. Students are placed in the same conditions, and their task is to show their professional skills. As a rule, the competition consists of a theoretical part (test tasks) and a practical task. The work of students is evaluated by a jury, which includes specialists from these professions. In the process of participating in the competition, students strive to perform their work as efficiently as possible, as they intend to win a prize. At the same time, after summing up the results of the competition, each of its participants can find out why the points were reduced. This allows you to perform self-analysis of work and avoid such mistakes in future activities. Participation in competitions of this kind allows students not only to improve their professional skills, but also to evaluate themselves in comparison with their fellow students,which, in turn, serves as an incentive for the formation of the need for professional improvement,what contributes professional development future specialist.

Those who did not take part in such competitions see the successes of their fellow students and also strive to reach their level, realizing that this is possible. In the competition, almost every student can show a high result. This requires knowledge, skill, ability to work confidently, quickly and efficiently.

The first place winner will be awarded the title of "Best in Profession". At the final event, the results of all work are summed up, the most active participants, members of the editorial board, winners, participants in professional skill contests, etc. are awarded. These events are always massive, with the involvement of a large number of children in this profession. Usually, amateur performances are prepared, and a mini-concert is held between assignments in the profession. The attendees receive a lot cognitive information, which broadens the horizons of students, stimulates the growth of professional skills, strengthens the desire to learn and improve.

Thus, the educational environment, where competitive activity is integrated with study, contributes to the preparation of a qualitatively new type of specialist in demand. modern production- a competitive specialist - a professional who is ready to find the optimal and effective method solving, completing the task.

On November 8, a solemn rewarding was held at the end of the Professional Skills Competition SRO Association "School of Safety" for the best organization of work in the field of security educational organizations Moscow.

The competition was held from April 1 to October 30, 2017 and consisted of five stages, during which the jury evaluated the participants according to various criteria. The contestants, with the support of the teams of their private security organizations, created video presentations, demonstrated theoretical knowledge and passed the stage of testing the practical skills of security at the posts.

Twenty nine was determined the best professionals in ensuring the protection of educational organizations, from among which six finalists were selected who won prizes.

The President of the SRO Association "School without Danger" Sergei Saminsky in his opening remarks emphasized that such a competition is not just an initiative of the organization's leadership, but also an undertaking universally supported by the state. Recently, the President of the Russian Federation congratulated the winners of the international competitions in professional skills WorldSkills. Russia first took part in this competition in 2013. Then our team did not take a high place. Now we are leaders in the training of blue-collar occupations.

The security industry has also joined this endeavor. The staff of the SRO Association "School without Danger" became a pioneer in this matter. Perhaps, in the future, the selection criteria and evaluation of the participants in the competition, and its other nuances will change. But the main thing is that it has started.

We will continue the contests, - emphasized Sergey Saminsky. - Since the devices of all private security structures, self-regulatory organization, all functionaries exist only so that the guards at the post at the right moment clearly and professionally fulfill their duties. And we will do our best to build up their skills.

Supervisor working group Alexey Zhuravlev of the Coordination Council for Security of the Moscow Department of Education said that, in his opinion, is fundamental in the work of security.

An integral part of your job is the ability to instantly navigate a difficult environment. This is the most important thing: to be able to correctly react to an incident and thereby save the lives and health of those who are in the educational organization. Comparing with the situation in 2010, I can say that the level of professional training of the guards has increased. I ask you all to support the level you have come to now.

Sergey Saminsky noted the representatives of the SRO Association "School without Danger", without which the competition would not have taken place. Among them is the vice-president of the SRO for scientific and methodological work Nikolai Stepanov, head of the Training Center professional qualifications SRO Tatyana Zaretskaya, SRO executive director Maria Shapkina and others.

This event did a lot to improve our educational process and our work in general, - said Nikolay Stepanov. - We marked as positive traits, knowledge and skills of our guards, and those nuances that need to be paid more attention in the future.

Tatiana Zaretskaya, who first proposed the idea of ​​holding a professional skill competition, said that this tradition has a long history. However, in the security community, she reminded, such a competition was held for the first time.

You are the best in your profession. Winner status is good, but it obliges a lot. Therefore, I wish you further professional development, I wish not to give up my professional positions.

The head of the expert department of the SRO Association "School without Danger" Vadim Yelensky, who became one of the examiners during the tests of the knowledge of the contestants in the field, shared his opinion about the competition.

Before private security organizations a difficult task was set - to select best employees to participate in the competition. Based on the results, we can say that they treated this in good faith and as responsibly as possible. We have before us really the best of the best.

Maria Shapkina, Executive Director of the SRO Association "School without Danger", also addressed the contestants with warm words:

The most worthy representatives of the profession have gathered here. Each of you, I will emphasize - everyone, regardless of whether he won a prize or not, is already a winner. We can say with complete confidence that all of you fulfill your job duties not only conscientiously and responsibly, but also with heart. We have repeatedly seen during the checks with what respect and love children treat you. In our opinion, this is the most important indicator of your work.

Who are these people, who have shown outstanding results among thousands of their colleagues, many of whom are also undoubtedly worthy of praise, who coped with the excitement, who were not at a loss before the sometimes tricky questions of the inspectors? Let's imagine them.

The third place was shared by E.V. Sergeeva and the security guard of the private security company "SOBR" N.N. Zharikov. They received a prize of fifty thousand rubles each, a diploma signed by the president of the SRO Association "School without Danger" Sergei Saminsky and letters of thanks from the deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Anatoly Vyborny and the deputy of the Moscow City Duma Inna Svyatenko.

The second place - the security guard of LLC "private security company" Shield "A.N. Belous and the security guard of "LLC CHOP" Yug-Delta "S.A. Pankov. They also received a diploma signed by Sergei Saminsky and letters of thanks from Anatoly Vyborny and Inna Svyatenko. The cash prize was one hundred thousand rubles each.

The winners were the security guards of the private security company "SOBR" D.P. Gamzyukov and E.A. Kovalev. In addition to a diploma signed by Sergei Saminsky and letters of thanks from Anatoly Vyborny and Inna Svyatenko, they received a cash prize of two hundred thousand rubles each and a trophy - the challenge cup of the winner of the professional skills competition.

Denis Gamzyukov, thanking the organizers of the event, expressed his conviction that it is impossible to stop at one competition. “This experience needs to be strengthened for the sake of what matters most - children and their safety,” he said. Elena Kovaleva expressed her gratitude to the creators of the competition for giving the guards the opportunity to prove themselves.

The real triumphant of the competition was the Euro-Alliance Group of Companies, several representatives of which were among the best in their profession. Group Executive Director Nikolay Aksenov shared how he managed to achieve this success.

We approached this competition very seriously, having conducted a thorough internal selection, one might say, an internal competition. We considered each candidate both from the point of view of his current state and from the point of view of his learning ability, having invested a lot of work in the preparation process. Each competition increases the prestige of the profession. Any athlete will tell you that the best workout is competition. Any competition is better than classroom training. This competition is the concentration of experience and knowledge, their adjustment and understanding. Its meaning is that after its completion we have become smarter and more professional.

All members of the jury note: during the competition, they did not see indifferent, and each guard put maximum effort into this competition.

Such a competition is needed by the security community. Its importance is evidenced by the support provided to the organizers by the deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation Anatoly Vyborny and the deputy of the Moscow City Duma Inna Svyatenko, who highly appreciated the idea of ​​such a competition. Therefore, no one doubts: next year will be held new competition, and its winners will demonstrate even more high level professional excellence.

SRO Press Service Association "School without Danger"

In accordance with the decision of the jury of the "Resonance" competition, approved by Minutes dated November 24, 2018, materials of the I (correspondence) round of the review (competitive video recordings) were evaluated by 4 criteria:

1. compliance with the goals and objectives of the competition;

2. content, information literacy of the presentation of educational material;

3. originality of pedagogical decisions;

4. speech culture of the teacher.

For each of the criteria, a score was established on a 3-point scale. Additional encouragement of the participant by 1-3 points was allowed for the demonstrated qualities that were not reflected in the criteria (as a dissenting opinion of a jury member).

According to the results of the I (correspondence) round of the show:

- the contestants who scored from 0 to 6.99 points were awarded the title "Participant of the Competition";

- the contestants who scored from 7.00 to 8.99 points were awarded special diplomas;

- Contestants who have scored 9.00 points and above are allowed to participate in the II (full-time) round of the competition.

Screenings of the II (full-time) round of the competition will be held on December 1 and 8, 2018 at the site of the State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education of the Central Television and Radio Broadcasting Center and MEO "Radost" from 10.00 to 18.00.

From 18.00 (!) November 26, the link is available to register at a convenient time for participation in the face-to-face stage.

The duration of an open lesson (rehearsal, master class) at the full-time stage of the competition, according to the regulations, will be 20 minutes; an additional 10 minutes is allocated for an interview with the jury, during which the contestants answer questions about their professional activities.

COMPETITORS WITH 9.00 POINTS AND ABOVE

(ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE II FULL ROUND OF THE COMPETITION)

  1. Afonina Olga Evgenievna
  2. Varlamova Victoria Valerievna
  3. Vasilieva Svetlana Anatolievna
  4. Volkova Natalia Valerievna
  5. Gelman Yulia Grigorievna
  6. Gemusova Daria Anatolievna
  7. Guseva Svetlana Ivanovna
  8. Zharova Elena Valentinovna
  9. Zhuravleva Ulyana Nikolaevna
  10. Ivashkina Irina Anatolyevna
  11. Ionova Svetlana Yurievna
  12. Konovalova Galina Vasilievna
  13. Rostislav Kostomarov
  14. Kryukova Natalia Yurievna
  15. Liring Svetlana Evgenievna
  16. Lishchenko Anastasia Viktorovna
  17. Maklakova Natalia Vladimirovna
  18. Moskovchuk Anna Alekseevna
  19. Nezadorova Tatiana Evgenievna
  20. Pereverzeva Irina Anatolievna
  21. Poido Maria Ivanovna
  22. Tarasova Elena Andreevna
  23. Chistyakova Anastasia Alexandrovna

COMPETITORS SCORING FROM 7.00 TO 8.99 POINTS

(BY THE JURY'S DECISION AWARDED WITH SPECIAL DIPLOMAS)

  1. Anisimova Tatiana Viktorovna
  2. Burmistrova Tatiana Petrovna
  3. Vlasova Elena Alexandrovna
  4. Olga Vlasova
  5. Olga V. Goryacheva
  6. Ivanova Anastasia Lvovna
  7. Kurdyukova Svetlana Vladimirovna
  8. Kurzanova Zinaida Yurievna
  9. Please, Margarita Anatolievna
  10. Pozhinajlo Margarita Vladimirovna
  11. Potapova Anastasia Viktorovna
  12. Rozanova Irina Sergeevna

JURY CHAIRMAN:

Plenipotentiary Expert of the Council for Grants of the President of the Russian Federation for Support creative projects of national importance in the field of culture and art, member of the jury All-Russian competitions"Teacher of the Year of Russia", "I give my heart to children", Ph.D., professor at the Center for Implementation of State Educational Policy and information technologies", Holder of medals K.D. Ushinsky, "Patriot of Russia", medals "For outstanding services" of the Russian Academy of Education

Lidia Petrovna DUGANOVA

JURY MEMBERS:

Honored Teacher of Russia, Excellence in Public Education, laureate of the Moscow Grant competition in the region innovative technologies in the field of music education

Nadezhda Vasilievna SEMINA

Methodist additional education of the highest category, member of the jury of the competition "Teacher of the Year" in the nomination "Teacher of additional education", member Expert Council competition of author's programs of additional education

Elena Nikolaevna FIGINA


1. General Provisions

1.1. The Moscow city competition of professional skills of teachers of continuing education "Resonance" 2018 (hereinafter referred to as the "Competition") is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the system of continuing education for children in Russia - a special type of education aimed at the comprehensive development of intellectual, spiritual, moral, physical, creative and professional the needs of the child.

1.2. The competition is held in September - December 2018.

1.3. The competition involves:

Revealing and dissemination of effective educational practices in the field of mass musical and aesthetic education of children and youth (including children with disabilities);

Creation of conditions for the exchange of professional work experience between teachers of additional education, implementing appropriate educational programs;

Support for teachers of additional education, revealing the educational, culture-forming potential of musical art in working with children, adolescents and youth.

1.4. The competition is held within the framework of the Moscow City Complex target program education of youth "Children of Moscow are singing".

1.5.The purpose of the competition- identification, support and development of effective educational practices and pedagogical technologies in the field of mass musical and aesthetic additional education for children and youth.

1.6.Objectives of the competition:

  • Identification and retransmission of the achievements of teachers of additional education, implementing programs of artistic and socio-pedagogical orientation in the field of musical and aesthetic education of children and youth.
  • Popularization of musical and performing arts among children and youth as effective environment artistic, civil-patriotic and spiritual and moral education of the younger generation.
  • Support for teachers of additional education who implement the most effective technologies for mass musical and artistic education of children, adolescents, youth, broadcasting their achievements in the open educational space of the Russian capital.
  • Broadcast of pedagogical ideas for updating the content of additional musical and aesthetic education for children and youth.
  • Support for teachers who implement programs of additional musical and aesthetic development in working with children with disabilities.
  • Development holistic system mass musical education in the space of general and additional education in Moscow.
  • Development of interaction and integration of resources of the systems of general and additional education of the city.
  • Attracting the attention of public authorities, commercial organizations, the general public to the educational and socializing resources of the system of mass musical and aesthetic additional education for children and youth.

2. Organizers of the competition


2.1. The Founder of the Competition is the Organizing Committee of the Moscow City Comprehensive Target Program for Youth Education "Children of Moscow Sing".

2.2 The direct organizer of the competition is the Center for Creative Development and Musical and Aesthetic Education of Children and Youth “Radost” - the leading institution of the city of Moscow in the field of mass musical, aesthetic and artistic education of youth, operator of the Department of Education of the City of Moscow for the implementation of the Moscow City Integrated Target Program education of youth "Children of Moscow are singing".

2.3. Official information about the Competition, its regulations and results is posted on the website of the City Program "Children of Moscow Sing" ( children of moscow.rf are singing ).

3. Competitors


The Moscow city competition of professional skills of teachers of additional education "Resonance" is attended by teachers who implement additional general educational (general developmental) programs in the field of musical and aesthetic education of children and youth and work with creative teams and students in the system of institutions subordinate to the Department of Education of the city of Moscow.

4. Nominations of the competition


The competition is held in 11 nominations:

  1. "Leaders and choirmasters of choral groups"
  2. "Leaders of vocal ensembles of the academic direction"
  3. "Leaders of pop vocal ensembles"
  4. "Leaders of vocal and instrumental ensembles"
  5. "Leaders and choirmaster of folklore groups"
  6. "Leaders of instrumental groups of the academic direction"
  7. "Leaders of collectives of Russian folk instruments"
  8. "Leaders of pop instrumental groups"
  9. "Teachers of associations of musical-aesthetic, musical-theoretical development of children" (classes in solfeggio, listening to music, rhythmics, collective singing and playing music on elementary instruments, etc.)
  10. “Teachers of individual classes in the field of musical and aesthetic education of children and youth (classes on learning to play musical instruments, individual vocals, composition, etc.)
  11. "Teachers of associations of musical and aesthetic development of children with disabilities"

5. Conditions and procedure for the competition


5.1. Moscow city competition of professional skills of teachers of additional education "Resonance" takes place in 2 rounds :

  • Round 1 - in absentia;
  • 2nd round - full-time.

5.2. For the first round, participants provide short summary , as well as a video that presents the practice of their work with children's creative teams, students (according to the declared nominations). These can be fragments of classes, master classes, rehearsals and other forms of educational work.

5.3. Requirements for the competition materials of the 1st round:

The video recording should clearly show the teacher himself, as well as the students (s) with whom (s) he works.

Video recording duration: 10-15 minutes. Longer videos will not be considered.

Videos are posted on open video hosting sites: YouTube, Rutube or uploaded to file hosting services; links are sent to the Organizing Committee of the competition.

In the summary, the participant of the competition lists his main creative achievements, the merits of children's creative teams, students with whom he works, briefly characterizes the basic principles, methods and pedagogical technologies that he uses in educational practice. The resume should not exceed 3,000 characters with spaces.

5.4. Admission to participation in the second round of the Competition is carried out by the decision of the competent jury.

5.5. The participant who passed by the decision of the jury to the II round of the competition conducts open class with students (imsya) (rehearsal, master class) according to a special schedule approved by the Organizing Committee, at one of the sites (as agreed with the Organizing Committee):

On the basis of the educational organization in which he works;

On the basis of the educational organization of the curator of the "Children of Moscow Singing" Program in the Okrug (in agreement with the curator);

On the basis of the State Budgetary Educational Institution of Educational Institutions DO TCD and MEO "Radost" (Mikhalkovskaya st., 22).

5.6. Requirements for the competition materials of the 2nd round:

An open training lesson (rehearsal, master class) should together represent professional competence the teacher, demonstrate the techniques worked out in solving special learning objectives, overcoming difficulties by students, reflect the nature of relationships with students.

Before the lesson, the participant provides the jury members with open lesson plan (rehearsals, master class). The plan includes: the name of the participant, his place of work, the full name of the event, goal, objectives, summary of the lesson.

5.7. Duration of an open lesson (rehearsal, master class): 30-45 minutes. The specified time includes a short interview with the jury members, during which the contestants answer questions about their professional activities.

5.8. The jury fully examines the open classes of all participants of the competition who have passed to the second round, and makes a final assessment according to the following criteria (see clause 6 of these Regulations).

5.9. Based on the results of the competition, an educational and practical conference is held with an award ceremony for participants and winners.

5.10. Approximate schedule of the Competition events:

Event

Timing

Location

Submission of applications for participation in the competition of professional skills of teachers of additional education "Resonance"

remotely, the website of the Program "Children of Moscow Sing" ( children of moscow.rf are singing)

I(correspondence) round of the competition - selection review of presentation videos and teachers' resumes sent to the competition

remotely,

GBOU DO CTR and MEO "Joy"

II(full-time) round of the competition - review open lessons, classes, rehearsals, master classes of participants held duringIIround of the competition

platforms of educational organizations of the city of Moscow,

GBOU DO CTR and MEO "Joy"

Final educational and practical conference. Award ceremony for participants and winners of the competition

11.00

White Hall

GBOU DO CTR and MEO "Joy"

6. Criteria for evaluating competitive performances


1. Compliance with the goals and objectives of the competition.

3. Ability to establish emotional contact, partnership, creatively productive relationships with students.

4. Ability to organize the interaction of students with each other (create conditions for the development of communication skills, partnership skills and educational interests of each student).

5. Ability to create and maintain a high level of motivation and intensity of learning activities of students in class.

6. Own performing, professional skills of the teacher in the represented sphere of creative activity.

7. Originality of pedagogical decisions, skill and resourcefulness in overcoming problem situations.

8. Speech culture of the teacher.

9. The depth and accuracy of the analysis of the lesson, reflection of the result of their activities (for a full-time round).

7. Jury of the competition


7.1. The jury of the "Resonance" competition includes well-known personalities Russian education, musicians-performers.

7.2. The composition of the jury for the nominations will be announced later.

8. Regulations for the evaluation of competitive performances


8.1. Competitive performances of participants are evaluated according to a rating system. The rating is formed from the sum of evaluations of competitive performances in accordance with the above criteria (clause 6 of these Regulations) according to a 3-point rating system for each criterion, as well as taking into account the possibility of obtaining additional points as a "dissenting opinion of a jury member".

8.2. The maximum number of points for evaluating the 2 (full-time) competitive performance by each jury member is 30 points:

On a set of criteria - 27;

As a "dissenting opinion of a jury member" - no more than 3.

Grand Prix (29.00 - 30.00 points);

Laureate of the I degree (27.00 - 28.99 points);

Laureate of the II degree (25.00 - 26.99 points);

Laureate III degree (23.00 - 24.99 points);

Diploma winner (20.00 - 22.99 points);

Participant (9.00 - 19.99 points).

8.4. The jury's decision is documented in a protocol. Appeals on the decisions of the jury will not be accepted.

8.5. The results of the competition are published on the website of the City Program "Children of Moscow Sing" (children of moscow.rf are singing).

8.6. The jury has the right to award a participant with a special diploma for the professional pedagogical competence clearly demonstrated at the competition.

9. Legal rules for participation in the competition


9.1. By submitting an application and materials for the "Resonance" competition, the teacher confirms his agreement with this Regulation and guarantees that:

According to these competition materials, he has no obligations to third parties that prevent the placement of materials on the websites of the Organizing Committee of the competition, the copyright law has been observed;

All materials that do not have links to any sources are copyright;

Photos, videos of minors are posted with the consent of their legal representatives (parents, guardians, etc.);

The author (s) grants (s) the right to the Organizing Committee of the festival-competition to use the materials, video recordings of the teacher's competitive performance or part of it with the indication of the author (s) at his own discretion without additional agreement with him (s) and without paying royalties in their projects, in including with the aim of popularizing of this competition, broadcasting the best pedagogical practices in print, at various conferences and business meetings, as well as in the form of publications.

9.2. In case of recorded copyright infringements (i.e. borrowing someone else's works or their essential fragments without attribution), the competition will not be considered by the jury.

Class:

In order to improve quality vocational training, promotion of blue-collar occupations, improvement of forms, methods and means industrial training at the school, a professional skill competition was held, defining creative youth mastering blue-collar professions.

The main objectives of the competition are to improve the professional skills of students, to identify and encourage the best students in construction specialties; increasing the importance and prestige of the profession of a builder.

The competition of professional skills among the students of the school was held on the basis of the order of the director of the institution No. 287 "O" dated 05.12.2008. The same order approved the Regulations on the competition, the composition of the organizing committee, the jury, the plan of events, and a responsible administrator (deputy director for UPR) was appointed. The terms of the competition are from 08.12.2008 to 23.01.2009.

The preparation and conduct of the professional skills competition was carried out by the organizing committee, which included:

To evaluate the results, a jury was created consisting of:

A professional skill competition to identify the "Best in Profession" among students is held annually. In the 2008-2009 academic year, the competition was held in several stages:

1) holding a competition of professional skills among students within the study group;

2) holding a competition of professional skills among students for each profession separately.

The opening of the professional skills competition was held in a solemn atmosphere on December 11, 2008 at the general school lineup. The order of the director on the holding of the competition, the composition of the jury and the organizing committee were announced, the schedule of events was posted at the stand. The opening was accompanied by a multimedia presentation, the content of which regulated the procedure for the competition and the historical moments of last year's competitions. Each group was presented with a symbolic "outfit" to participate in the competition.

When preparing contests for professional skills by profession, a whole system of organizational and pedagogical activities was carried out:

1. Improvement of the educational and material base of the workshops, in particular, building materials were purchased for joiners - carpenters (a sheet of plywood), gloves for masons were purchased, products for cooks - confectioners were purchased.

2. The organizing committee of the competition selected a rational set of educational production works for participants in the competition to identify the best in a specific profession.

3. The developed tasks for the theoretical training of participants in the professional skills competition contained an exact formulation of the goal of the task in accordance with the content of the educational and program documentation.

4. The content and quantity of production works to be performed by the participants of the competition were clearly defined.

5. The norms of time for the performance of work have been established.

6. The possibilities of equipping workshops, the degree of preparedness of students, the demand for manufactured products in the everyday life of the school, the amount of material passed on special subjects were taken into account.

7. The scope of work performed was selected from the list of trial qualification works by profession for the IV category.

8. The necessary training and technical documentation was developed. Each student was provided with it.

Before the start of each competition by profession, a ceremonial formation of participants was held. The deputy chairman of the jury announced the tasks of the competition to the participants of the competition, handed over envelopes with tasks. The initial stage included a theoretical task in the form of a test for knowledge of special technology, terms, materials science by profession, the second stage was the execution of a production task.

The results of the professional skill competition for the best student by profession were summed up by the jury, through an open vote. The jury members of the competition gave an assessment practical work participants of the competition, and the level of their theoretical training within the limits established by the competition tasks. During the competition, the jury members monitored the correctness labor practices, technological literacy of work, time to complete tasks, compliance with labor protection and safety requirements.

The winners of the competition were determined by the best performance indicators competition tasks... The main criteria for assessing the results of the execution of competitive tasks were:

  • labor productivity and quality of completed tasks;
  • level of theoretical training;
  • the use of rational techniques and methods of work;
  • fulfillment of the student's norms of time (development) for the test task;
  • the degree of industrial independence of the student in the performance of competitive tasks; rationality of the organization of labor and workplace;
  • compliance with labor safety requirements in the performance of competition tasks.

In case of equality of the indicators established for the competition, the preference was given to the student with the best indicator in industrial training.

The jury of the competition issued nine protocols on the results of the competition of professional skills, reporting the results and indicating the winners.

1. According to the results of the intra-school competition "The best in the profession" Master of finishing construction works»Among freshmen it was decided to assign:

2. According to the results of the intra-school competition "The best in the profession" Master of finishing construction works "among the II and III courses, assign:

3. Based on the results of the intra-school competition "Best in Profession" Master general construction works", Among students of the II, III course, assign on the basis of the final statement:

4. Pupils of the 1st year (group No. 2) were awarded with encouraging letters:

"For strong knowledge of the theory of stone work":

Nikolay Grigoriev,
Volkov Andrey,
Dmitry Vasiliev.

"For the desire to win":

Nikitin Sergey,
Krdyshov Sergey,
Kudryashov Artur.

5. According to the results of the intra-school competition "The best in the profession" Master of carpentry work ", assign on the basis of the final statement:

6. According to the results of the intra-school competition "The best in profession" Auto mechanic "among the II and III courses to assign:

7. According to the results of the intra-school competition "The best in profession" Cook "to assign:

The winners of the competition, who won prizes, were awarded diplomas, they were awarded the title "Best in Profession" and were awarded certificates and valuable prizes during the final competition "Rainbow of Professions".

The creative contests were aimed at identifying talented youth through the activation of the work of the self-government body in the group, the implementation of tasks to unite the student team, reveal the facets of student talent, as well as the formation of over-professional competencies of students.

In the competition of wall newspapers "Moya Professiya", the places were decided to be distributed as follows:

In the nomination "Exhibition of technical creativity of students in the framework of the competition of professional skills" Best in the profession-2009 "places were distributed as follows:

2. In a research paper competition

Ivan Kostrov,
BodroGordo, Creative Director

In small companies, people compete, as a rule, for their own percentage of the sale or bonus from the implementation of the plan and the achievement of the overall success of the company. Competition in small organizations makes sense when representatives of the same profession compete. Otherwise, the "competition" will be dishonest.
In some large companies especially with democratic governance, there is a practice of competition within departments or throughout the organization. It is especially noteworthy that this is not directly called a competition or competition, but is neatly embedded in the corporate culture. And this is probably the best I've seen inside organizations. Let's look at how the Swedish company IKEA implements this, which currently employs about 20 thousand people, and each store has about 300 employees.

The whole company is divided into departments, departments into departments, departments are divided into business zones. Each of the business zones has its own plan for a day, a week (more important than a day) and a month, which is combined into overall plan store. Employees do not have personal plan sales, which allows you not to compete with each other, but to organize to achieve a common goal. A department can differentiate itself against the backdrop of the entire store by increasing the percentage of achieving weekly goals and contributing to a common cause - fulfilling the sales plan for the entire store. The result of an individual person will not be noticeable against the background of the entire store and even the department, although the employee as a whole has levers of influence on making more purchases by visitors.

With a certain frequency, employees, including managers and top managers, participate in rotation and work in neighboring departments of the same department. And they even migrate by department, for example, the head of furniture can swap places with the head of related products. Thus, all employees become interchangeable in case some of the departments need help to achieve, again, the common goal of the store. This is an important aspect, it fosters collectivism.

Anna Molchanova, deputy
executive director National Roofing Union

The goal of participating in the competition is to win. It's like in sports. And the "training" of the participants to win is no less. Example: In 2009, in St. Petersburg, the National Roofing Union hosted the IFD Roofing Championship. Everyone understood our technological lag in the tile nomination from the leaders - Germans, Swiss, Austrians. We invited a German teacher who came and studied with our team. When the guys took the first place, it was such an intensity of passion, such jubilation! They still remember.

To what extent are skill contests related (and are they generally related), motivation and employee engagement? Directly. Actually, the goal is motivation. Another thing is that some contests turn out to be so ugly organized, so boring and formal that the effect turns out to be the opposite. Much depends on the organizers and their experience.

Along with the competitions of professional skills, traditionally held by companies, there are competitions and championships for students and young professionals.
When applying for participation, each competitor has a specific goal. However, there are key motivating factors regardless of age and status: whether it is an undergraduate student or a specialist with work experience in the company. These "drivers" often have deep psychological roots.
First, it is an opportunity to test yourself in a “safe” environment. In the conditions of voluntary passage of the competition, participants are insured against the inevitable receipt of an assessment of knowledge and skills. The ideal situation to try without fear of being wrong or “being bad”. At the same time, if the result of the competition satisfied the participant himself, he can present it to interested parties (indicate in the resume, show it to the employer or teacher at the department).
Secondly, this is a chance to show yourself, to realize your ambitions. There may not be a desire for material reward, it is enough to get recognition of skills and talents. After all, the need for praise, approval and recognition is a basic psychological need for a person.
Thirdly, this is an opportunity to establish yourself as a professional and start (and for already practicing specialists - to continue) successful career in the area of ​​interest. For example, for those who show the best result in the ACCA-IFRS PROFESSIONAL Student competition, partner employers will offer internships or even vacancies. Thus, professional competition becomes a "social lift": in a short time you can move from the category of an ordinary student to a popular student young specialist

Konstantin Gozman, general director agricultural holding
"Doronichi" Kirov region

The purpose of any competition of professional skills is to improve the skills of a specialist, his professional qualities, raising the bar for achieving certain business goals and objectives, developing new projects and ideas for the development of business processes, plus assessing professional qualities in order to promote a specialist in career ladder.
The approach will undoubtedly be different - if in managerial positions and managerial positions we introduce clear KPIs with the definition of indicators and deadlines their achievements, then for the line personnel of the agricultural sector and processing enterprises we conduct brigade and personalized contests with a clear system of criteria. All this works for development corporate culture holding, when personnel, not only individually, but also in a group of colleagues, can develop, apply new advanced experience and knowledge in business processes and, what is important, support a great desire for development in people.

A correctly set task of a professional skill competition can contribute to the development of a unity of views on business processes, development team spirit and dedication to the enterprise in achieving results.